We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

The Ill-Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

The Ill-Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age

            The chief aim of this paper is to argue for the need to designate 21 as the mandated minimum legal drinking age applicable to all the States of this country, on account of the ill-effects which may be identified in respect to lowering the same. Presently, there is no Federal law which stipulates a uniform minimum drinking age requirement for entire the country. And there are reasons to suppose that this country’s apparent lack of a universally implementable age requirement for legitimate drinking engenders ill-effects for the larger society.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
The Ill-Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

This paper draws from Toomey, Rosenfield and Wagenaar’s “Minimum Legal Drinking Age: Facts and Fallacies”.

Lower MLDA vis-à-vis Road Accidents, Public Safety and Health-Related Issues

            In the first place, one of the most conspicuous effects ensuing from any decision to lower the minimum legal drinking age manifests itself in the perceived increase of “drunk driving” incidents, which in turn increases the number of teenagers figuring in road mishaps.

According to Toomey, Rosenfield and Wagenaar, there are “several studies”, as early as the 1970s, which can show that “motor vehicle crashes increased significantly among teens when the MLDA was lowered” (1). Put in other words, this means that there exists an inverse proportion palpable between the cases of reported road accidents involving teenagers on the one hand, and the stipulated legally allowable age for drinking on the other hand; i.e., the lower a State mandates MLDA, the higher frequency of road accidents are reported.

            In view of the foregoing, it is therefore only logical to claim that lowering the legally allowable age for drinking can, in effect, compromise the safety and wellbeing of the greater society. This is a contention that is surely not bereft of good reasons; for if a community is continuously plagued with road accidents every so often, then it creates an adverse effect on public safety. This is not to mention that drunk driving can, at times, kill innocent lives as well. If cases of this nature happen frequently in a given place, then it surely creates a general atmosphere of anxiety and fear, if not anger and disgust from the community belonging to it.

Another unwelcome drawback consequential to a State’s decision to permit the lowering of minimum legal drinking age may be seen in a number of health problems which are engendered by excessive drinking. This again, constitutes a major problem for the greater American populace. Toomey, Rosenfield and Wagena cite that there are reports which can show the statistical significance of health-related issues hampering the population of the United States, on account of permitting alcohol use among younger people. Citing a study conducted by a Single, the authors note, “research confirms that Europeans have rates of alcohol-related diseases (such as cirrhosis of the liver) similar to or higher than those in the U.S. population” (2). The implication of this problem should not be underestimated; for it is axiomatic to claim that the state of the nation rests largely on the well-being of its people.

Conclusion

            Hence, this paper ends with a thought which affirms its initially slated thesis statement: that it is imperative to stipulate a law which designates 21 as the legally allowable age for alcohol consumption for all the States of this country, since the effects of lowering the MLDA can be disadvantageous in the ultimate analysis. In sum, the discussions enumerated three ill-effects ensuing from lowering the MLDA – i.e., it effects (a) the perceived increase in road accidents, (b) a feeling of compromised public safety and well-being, and (c) the statistical significance of reported health-related drawbacks among many American young people.

Reference

Toomey, T., Rosenfield, C. & Wagenaar, A. “The Minimum Legal Drinking Age: Facts and       Fallacies”.

 

Cite this The Ill-Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age

The Ill-Effects of Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age. (2016, Oct 15). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/the-ill-effects-of-lowering-the-minimum-legal-drinking-age/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page