The Reproductive Health Bill in the Philippines is a significant matter that has the potential to greatly influence moral values and culture. It can deeply impact every Filipino’s understanding of reproduction and sex. Unfortunately, many Filipinos are unaware of the possible negative consequences this bill may have on our traditional Filipino morality.
Religious groups, organizations, and a few conservative Filipinos opposed this bill, while those focused solely on politics and business believed that reducing poverty could be achieved through population control. They thought that distributing the country’s resources evenly among its population could be possible. Later, we will discuss the future effects of this bill. One of the top politicians in the country, Francisco S. Tatad, strongly opposes the Reproductive Health bill in the House of Representatives, emphasizing that it is being presented as both a health bill and an antipoverty bill simultaneously.
It is both contradictory and contrary to the claims made by its authors. The bill serves as an ideological assault on human life, the family, and our social and cultural values. Its foundation is flawed, as it is not required, violates the Constitution, suppresses religious beliefs, and undermines public morals and family values. Passing this bill will only exacerbate the prevailing lack of understanding regarding the actual matters at hand.
The bill should be rejected. Both religious sectors and some intellectuals view it as an attack on Filipino morals. If you are wondering why the bill is considered immoral, let’s discuss it after you have read it. If you are someone who considers religion and morality as insignificant elements in life, then you may be one of the western individuals who believe science, commerce, and technology are the solutions to poverty.
If you believe in the value of God’s given system for life and the correct way to achieve a fulfilling life in the present and future, your views may strongly align with the reproductive health bill. The author of the bill has outlined the following objectives:
- To uphold and promote respect for life, informed choice, birth spacing and responsible parenthood in conformity with internationally recognized human rights standards.
- To guarantee universal access to medically-safe, legal and quality reproductive health care services and relevant information even as it prioritizes the needs of women and children.
The Bill seeks to safeguard the rights of women and medical professionals in maternity duty, promote family values, and provide sexual education for young individuals. The focus of this education is on students aged 10 to 11 years old, specifically those in Grades 5 to 10. The Bill also highlights the significance of personal responsibility. These initiatives collectively work towards three primary objectives: addressing poverty, managing population growth, and preventing the transmission of AIDS (HIV). Nonetheless, critics contend that these favorable elements are merely a facade. Now, let us delve into the adverse consequences associated with this legislation.
If the Bill is passed, it signifies that we are granting program participants authorization to educate our young children about contraceptives and methods to prevent pregnancy. Consequently, this implies that we are introducing the concept of sexual experimentation to our children, regardless of their level of readiness. By instructing them on condom usage, their curiosity may result in engaging in sexual activities.
Exposure to sex education may decrease people’s understanding of the significance of selecting an appropriate partner and timing for sexual activity, potentially resulting in a rise in rape cases. It is argued that conversations about sex should primarily occur at home with parental guidance, rather than being controlled by government initiatives. Enacting this legislation would encroach upon parents’ authority to instill moral principles in their children.
If the Bill is approved, there would be an increase in HIV cases. Despite being advertised as such, safe condoms do not exist; companies do not demonstrate the use of their condoms with an AIDS victim in commercials. In countries like Thailand that have implemented sex education and birth control bills, HIV cases have actually risen. This is because sex should be regarded as a sacred act deserving respect. When individuals are educated about it and provided with access to condoms, they may engage in hazardous behavior under the false assumption that condoms offer complete protection.
If the Bill is passed, it would be unrealistic to expect that your 15-year-old daughter will maintain her virginity. Society no longer regards sex as sacred or worthy of respect; rather, it views it as a beautiful aspect of the human body. Furthermore, the passing of the Bill would lead to a rise in prostitution.
If the Bill is passed, it will become challenging to find a young and traditional girl who has remained chaste to marry. This situation mirrors the scarcity of 18-year-old virgins in America and Europe. As Filipinos are naturally inclined towards conservatism, any decrease in conservativeness brought about by the Bill will have repercussions on our culture and attitudes towards women.
Filipinos, being devout Christians, have a natural belief in God’s way of creating life. Our desire is to follow the natural path that aligns with God’s will. However, this bill has the capacity to alter our faith by introducing artificial birth control methods. It is important to note that all forms of birth control carry potential negative consequences, even including natural methods which may fail to prevent pregnancy. Nevertheless, the use of artificial birth control methods comes with additional adverse effects. These include hormonal options such as pills, injections, and patches.
Hormonal birth control methods have several common side effects, including increased acne, weight gain, depression, spotting between periods, decreased libido, vaginal infections, and nausea/vomiting. In addition to these common side effects, there are also more serious risks such as blood clots, a potentially higher risk of cervical cancer, heart attacks, and strokes. It is recommended to consider alternative options like condoms,
cervical cap,
diaphragm,
spermicides and sponges when using hormonal birth control methods.
Help for Lichen Sclerosis Natural Ointment has Reduced Lichen Sclerosis Symptoms www.perrinskinblends.com Sponsored Links
Barrier contraception methods, such as condoms, cervical caps, diaphragms, spermicides, and sponges, can cause side effects. These may include allergies to the materials used and irritation during use. If these methods are not removed promptly after use, toxic shock syndrome can occur. The World Health Organization has raised concerns about the potential for increased risk of HIV transmission with the commonly used spermicide nonoxynol-9. Furthermore, women who use diaphragms and cervical caps may be more prone to urinary tract infections.
Both vaginal rings and intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been associated with an increased risk of developing vaginitis. IUDs can result in severe bleeding, cramping, uterine perforation, and pain following insertion. Both male and female sterilization procedures carry the potential for post-surgical pain and/or regret. Female sterilization methods, like tubal ligation, may lead to complications related to anesthesia and a higher likelihood of ectopic pregnancy if the procedure is unsuccessful. Emergency contraception is used to prevent unintended pregnancies after unprotected sexual intercourse.
The side effects of emergency contraception usually subside within 24 hours after the last dose. These may include nausea, vomiting, breast tenderness, fatigue, and abdominal pain.
According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, birth control pills are linked to severe side effects such as an elevated risk of blood clots, stroke, and heart attack. Additional serious side effects consist of worsened migraine headaches, gall bladder disease, higher blood pressure, and an exceptionally rare liver tumor.
The connection between disability and poverty is comparable to the relationship between conflict and poverty. Poverty can lead to disability, just as disability can lead to poverty. It is important to acknowledge that not all disabilities are a result of poverty; nonetheless, individuals in impoverished circumstances are more prone to encountering health issues, substandard living conditions, and unsafe work environments.
