The Risk Pool Game

Read Summary
Summary

Risk pooling is a powerful tool used to address variability in the supply chain. The Risk Pool game was used to compare the performances of centralized and decentralized systems under different scenarios. When demand correlation was negative, the centralized system showed higher profit maximization and lower holding costs compared to the decentralized system. When demand correlation was positive, both systems experienced losses, but the centralized system had lesser losses. The centralized system with a common warehouse and shorter lead time had lower holding costs and reduced the risk of overstock compared to the decentralized system. Demand variation was high when demand was negatively correlated, and decentralized system retailers needed to have high safety stock and faced tough competition.

Table of Content

Risk Pooling is one of the most powerful tools used to address variability in the supply chain. This tool suggests that demand variability is reduced if one aggregates demand. Risk Pool game executes both centralized and decentralized systems simultaneously to compare the performances to understand the concept. The game was played under different scenarios using the default values. Scenarios: Changing the demand correlation conditions ranging from strong negative to strong positive -Changing the standard deviation. Negative Demand correlation: when the game was played with strong negative range the revenue, and costs for both centralized and decentralized systems are positive and equal. Centralized system showed higher maximization of profits and low holding costs compared to decentralized system. Demand for both the markets was met with 100% fulfill rate.

The demand variation between retailers was high. Positive demand correlation: when the game was played with strong positive range the revenue, and costs for both centralized and decentralized systems were positive and equal. Centralized system showed higher maximization of profits and low holding costs compared to decentralized system. Demand for both the markets was met with 100% fulfill rate. The demand variation was almost equal in this scenario.

Increase the variability of demand: Co-efficient of variation increases as the variability of demand increases. Centralized system showed more profit when the demand correlation was negative. Both centralized and decentralized systems resulted in experiencing loss when the correlation was positive. However, loss from centralized system was lesser than that of decentralized system. In the centralized system 3 retailers have a common warehouse and the Lead time for is only 2 days. So there is no necessity for them to have high safety stock.

It will automatically reduce the holding costs and also sharing a warehouse will definitely reduce the risk of overstock. The demand for products may vary from one retailer to the other. From the analysis, the variation was high when the demand was negatively correlated. With 4 days lead time retailers in decentralized system need to have high safety stock. The risk of overstock is also high since this system does not have a warehouse. Decentralized system experience tough competition especially, when the demand correlation is negative.

Cite this page

The Risk Pool Game. (2016, Dec 25). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/the-risk-pool-game/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront