Worlds are collectivized animate beings. Meaning. worlds must invariably seek each other for aid and comfort in order to transport on their mundane lives. However. because dependance is one of many important basic demands. it has found its topographic point merely in people’s deepest. unconscious memories. However. in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. the author utilizes his primary characters in order to stress the built-in function of dependance in relationships ; he finally proposes that worlds must depend on each other for them to socially thrive. The general relationship between Pozzo and Lucky is that of a maestro and a slave. Throughout the transition. Pozzo does non look to handle Lucky with careful regard or consideration. However. it does non strike as shocking because it absolutely fits the stereotyped relationship between a maestro and a slave. While Pozzo does look to somehow take pleasance in his place. it shortly becomes apparent that the relationship between Lucky and Pozzo is instead interrelated and more “involved” than a mere relationship between a maestro and his slave.
To add to that. Pozzo does non name Lucky by his name. Alternatively. he often calls him “pig” . The word “pig” by and large carries a negative intension as hogs are normally viewed as scandalous animate beings. Such a mention reveals Pozzo’s cruel. apathetic attitude toward a more “inferior” being. Although Pozzo seems to be the opinion figure in this relationship. he is really the one dependant on Lucky. By taking full control over this person. he fulfills his thirst for control and power. Because he can non readily control himself. he tries to happen an alternate to this option. Thus. Lucky is Pozzo’s manner of accomplishing the phase of self-actualization. and Pozzo is truly “lucky” to hold Lucky beside him. In this extract. Vladimir and Estragon tend to reiterate each other as if they are unable to explicate thoughts on their ain. Furthermore. by holding them repeat the same words or phrases. the writer turns them into what seems like “mindless automatons. ” This transmutation into robotic beings is an unfortunate side consequence of falling into the custodies of conformance.
Furthermore. being collectivized animate beings. conformance becomes ineluctable. Possibly. through Vladimir and Estragon. the writer aims to show to his readers this human inclination. Just like these persons. people by and large “depend” on each other to comfortably suit into society. Throughout the full narrative. Vladimir systematically reminds Estragon that they are waiting for Godot. and toward the terminal of the transition. Vladimir once more reminds Estragon that. “We’re waiting for Godot. ” Whenever Vladimir reminds Estragon of Godot. it seems that Vladimir wants to corroborate their determination under witting consensus. On the other manus. when Estragon is reminded about his true intent merely with Vladimir’s aid. Therefore. Beckett clearly shows that Estragon every bit good as Vladimir are both dependent on one another. Therefore. when they are together. they are able to solidify their end. Merely by being in each other’s presence. they are able to happen confidence and to clear up their waies in life.
As shown in the drama. dependance is an built-in portion which defines worlds. Therefore. people must happen support among themselves in order to be “complete. ” By skilfully utilizing Pozzo. Lucky. Vladimir. and Estragon. Beckett highlights the significance of dependance. Besides. the author defines the true value of relationships built on dependance. stressing the demand for worlds to encompass it. In bring forthing this literary work. the writer wishes to promote his readers to openly seek dependance. Possibly. that might take to more powerful relationships. making an chance for people to break their society from within.