We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Energy crops factsheet: Miscanthus

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Energy harvests factsheet: Miscanthus (Miscanthus sinensis)

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Energy crops factsheet: Miscanthus
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Fig. 3.ten:Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) in a research field. ( Beginning: Markus Hagenlocher, Wikimedia Commons ) .

  • Speciess description.

Speciess taxonomy

Scientific name:

Miscanthus sinensisAndersson ( 1855 )

Synonym:

Eulalia japonicaTrin. ,Miscanthus condensatusHack. ,Miscanthus purpurascensAnderss. ,Miscanthus sinensisdegree Fahrenheit.glaberHonda,Miscanthus sinensisvolt-ampere.condensatus( Hack ) Makino,Miscanthus sinensisvolt-ampere.formosanusHack. ,Miscanthus sinensisvolt-ampere.gracillimusHitchc. ,Miscanthus sinensisvolt-ampere.purpurascens( Anderson ) Matsum. ,Miscanthus sinensisvolt-ampere.variegatusBeal,Miscanthus sinesisvolt-ampere.zebrinusBeal,Saccharum japonicumThunb. ,Xiphagrostis condensatus( Hack ) W. Wight

Taxonomic tree (Catalog of Life, 2015) :

Kingdom: Plant kingdom

Phylum: Tracheophyta

Class: Monocotyledones

Order: Poales

Family: Gramineae

Genus:Miscanthus

Speciess:Miscanthus sinensis

Preferred Dutch name:

Klein prachtriet

Preferred English name:

Chinese Ag grass

Other Dutch names:

Not applicable

Other English names:

Chinese fairygrass ; eulaliagrass ; Nipponese pampas grass ; Nipponese Ag grass ; inaugural grass ; pampas grass ; plume grass ; wild sugar cane ; zebra grass

Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) is a reed or cane like, robust perennial works that can make up to 4 m in tallness and in Europe reaches highs of 1.

0–2.3 m ( Clifton-Brown et al.

, 2001 ) .M. sinensisis a bunch forming and shortly rhizomatous works. Branchs are long and arching and the foliages distributing or saging and extend to up to a meter long and 25mm broad. The foliages feature a silver-white midvein with crisp, re-curving tips ( USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) . Leaf borders are crisp and somewhat serrated ( CABI, 2015 ) .The silvery to blanch pink, fan molded panicle is 10 centimeter to 60 centimeters long and relentless through the winter. The panicle subdivisions are go uping or erect. The mated spines are glabrous and really little ( 4–6.5 millimeter ) , xanthous to brown colored and encircled with white or purple-coloured hairs at the base ( USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) . The xanthous brown to somewhat reddish seeds have membranous chaffs and are hidden, are sparsely haired, and are twisted at the tip ( Miller, 2003 ; ISSG, 2015 ) .

Life rhythm

M. sinensis, blooming takes topographic point in August to October in the Northern hemisphere ( EPPO, 2015 ) . It is a windpollinated works ( Hayashi, 1979 ; Hayashi et al. , 1981 ; Nakagoshi, 1984 ) that appears to be self-incompatible ( Hirayoshi et al. , 1955 ; Nechiporenko et al. , 1997 ; Matumura, 1998a ; Stewart et al. , 2009 ) .M. sinensisgreen goodss seeds which are chiefly dispersed by air current and reproduces vegetatively through rootstocks ( USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) . Rhizomes allow a moderate horizontal enlargement.

Generative capacity

M. sinensisgreen goodss seeds which are chiefly dispersed by air current and reproduces vegetatively through rootstocks ( USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) .M. sinensisproduces a fecund Numberss of seeds ( EPPO, 2015 ) . Each works is capable of turning 100 panicles which together produce 6500 to 140000 seeds per m? in its native scope ( Stewart et al. , 2009 ) . Therefore,M. sinensiscould bring forth 6.5 x 10-7to 1.4 tens 10-9seeds per hour angle-1( Quinn et al. , 2011 ) .M. sinensisbesides establishes seed Bankss that can take to farther constitution ( Meyer, 2003a ; ISSG, 2015 ) . Hayashi and Numata ( 1971 ) found that about half of the seeds produced in one twelvemonth were still feasible the undermentioned summer but concluded that theMiscanthuscommunity was more dependent on vegetive reproduction instead than seed production.Germination rates of up to 72 % for cosmeticM. sinensispersons puting big measures of seed ( & gt ; 3,000 3+ panicles-1) have been reported ( Meyer & A ; Tchida, 1999 ) . However, seed viability depends on the assortment ( EPPO, 2015 ) . WhileMeyer & A ; Tchida ( 1999 ) found feasible seed set by many cosmetic cultivars ofM. sinensis,most varicolored signifiers set less than 18 % feasible seed. Furthermore, Matumura & A ; Yukimura ( 1975 ) found a broad fluctuation in seed set over a figure of old ages ( CABI, 2015 ) . In the event thatM. sinensisis planted as a biocrop, complete asepsis or multiple mechanisms of functional asepsis, in add-on to careful monitoring, could dramatically cut down the likeliness of flight or hybridisation with extant natural stateM. sinensispopulations. Furthermore, Clifton-Brown et Al. ( 2011 ) predicted that constitution ofMiscanthusspp. from seed in spring is improbable in Northern Europe without harvest direction patterns aimed at raising dirt temperature under present climatic conditions.

  • Habitat drumhead including tabular array of environmental tolerances.

Habitat type

M. sinensisfrequently colonises ruderal, disturbed and urban countries ( ISSG, 2015 ) . It is frequently found on waysides, along railroads, power-lines, shores of reservoirs forest borders, sides of reservoirs, and in old Fieldss following fires ( Morisawa, 1999 ; CABI, 2015 ; The Bugwood Networket al. , 2003 ; ISSG, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015 ) .

Temperature

The average maximal temperature and average minimal temperature tolerated byM. sinensisare 22-32 ?C and -2-12 ?C, severally ( CABI, 2015 ) ( Table ten ) . The works grows good in cool temperate climes ( Farrell et al. , 2006 ) , and is able to last cold climes with temperatures every bit low as -26°C ( USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) . However, it does non turn good in humid, hot southern climes ( EPPO, 2015 ) . Cold tolerance together with an ability to be grown from seed affordsM. sinensispractical advantages over current cultivars of the higher-yielding intercrossed species, M. x giganteus ( Jorgensen, 1997 ; Clifton-Brown et al. , 2001 ; Farrell et al. , 2006 ; Quinn et al. , 2010 ) . However, in Japan,M. sinensisstarted bring forthing seeable biomass at a average air day-to-day temperature of 7OC ( Stewart et al. , 2009 ) . Furthermore, there was important fluctuation between theM. sinensishalf-sib households with 50 % sprouting within 15 yearss of sowing ( T15d) runing from 12 to 17OC ( Clifton-Brown et al. , 2011 ) . Clifton-Brown et Al. ( 2011 ) predicted that dirt temperatures in spring in Northern Europe would suppress sprouting under present climatic conditions.

Light

M. sinensisis shade intolerant but can be found in sparsley wooded countries and in little glades ( ISSG, 2015 ) . It has been shown to digest shadiness in the United States ( Meyer, 2003 ; Horton et al. , 2010 ; Quinn et al. , 2010 ) . However, EPPO ( 2015 ) province thatM. sinensisdemands full visible radiation to set up and reproduce.M. sinensisis a C4 photosynthetic and so has a high radiation efficiency compared with most C3 workss ( Farrell et al. , 2006 )

Moisture

M. sinensisrequires a average one-year rainfall of 1003 to 2093 millimeter ( CABI, 2015 ) ( Table ten ) . The works is said to be the most drought tolerant member of theMiscanthusgenus and may be better adapted to drought emphasis than current assortments ofMeter. tengiganteus( Clifton-Brown & A ; Lewandowski, 2000 ; Clifton-Brown et al. , 2002 ; Quinn et al. , 2010 ) . At really low dirt wetM. sinensisis able to efficaciously cut down leaf conductance and keep leaf country ( Clifton-Brown & A ; Lewandowski, 2000 ; Smith & A ; Barney, 2014 ) . It is a C4 photosynthetic works and so has a high H2O usage efficiency compared with most C3 workss ( Farrell et al. , 2006 ) .

Soil type

Once established, genotypes ofM. sinensiscan digest a broad scope of hapless dirt conditions, but prefers rich, damp, well-drained substrate for maximal growing ( Morisawa, 1999 ; Meyer, 2003 ; SE-EPPC, 2008 ; CABI, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015 ) . It is able to digest dirts of assorted ( low ) pH, compacted dirts and alimentary hapless dirts ( ISSG, 2008 ; EPPO, 2015 ; Stewart et al. , 2009 ; Quinn et al. , 2010 ) . In its native Japan,M. sinensishas been found to be the exclusive works species turning in extremely acidic dirts ( Stewart et al. , 2009 ) . Furthermore, it is tolerant of heavy metals ( Hsu & A ; Chou, 1992 ) and aluminum in the dirt ( Ezaki et al. , 2008 ; CABI, 2015 ) . It is a C4 photosynthetic works and so has a high N efficiency compared with most C3 workss ( Farrell et al. , 2006 ) .M. sinensisdoes n’t last in dirt with a high salt content ( Gilman, 1999 ) .

Table 1:Physiological conditions tolerated by Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) .

Parameter

Happening

Mentions

Average one-year temperature ( ?C )

12-18

CABI ( 2015 )

Mean maximal temperature of hottest month ( ?C )

22-32

CABI ( 2015 )

Mean minimal temperature of coldest month ( ?C )

-2-12

CABI ( 2015 )

50 % sprouting within 15 yearss of sowing ( T15d?C )

12-17

Clifton-Brown et Al. ( 2011 )

Average one-year rainfall ( millimeter )

1003-2093

CABI ( 2015 )

Dirt features

Free draining, acidic, shallow and sterile dirts with a visible radiation to medium teture

CABI ( 2015 )

  • Recorded distribution

Native scope.

M. sinensisis native to the Russian Federation, China, Japan, Taiwan, Republic of Korea, Philippines, and Indonesia ( ISSG, 2015 ) .

Cultivated scope

No information on the cultivated scope ofM. sinensiscould be found during a hunt of available literature.

Non-native scope.

M. sinensisis non-native toEurope:Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Russia ( native ) , Switzerland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Denmark ( EPPO, 2015 ) and Sweden ( CABI, 2015 ) ;North America: It is considered invasive in the U.S.A. ( ISSG, 2015 ) and is present in the States of Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia ) , Canada ( Ontario ) ( CABI, 2015 ) ;Asia: China, Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Taiwan ;Oceanica: Australia ( New South Wales, Tasmania ) ( ISSG, 2015 ; CABI, 2015 ) and New Zealand ( CABI, 2015 ) ;South America: Chile ( CABI, 2015 ; ISSG, 2015 ) , Argentina, Brazil and Puerto Rico ( CABI, 2015 ) ( Figure 3.x ) .

Fig. 3.ten:Current planetary recorded distribution of Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) . Beginning: ISSG, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015.

Distribution in the Netherlands

Fig. 3.ten:Current recorded distribution of Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) in the Netherlands. Beginning: Nationale Databank Flora en Fauna, 2015.

thirty

Fig. 3.ten:Number of annual records of Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) in the Netherlands. Beginning: Nationale Databank Flora en Fauna, 2015.

Colonization of high preservation value home grounds.

Table 3.ten:Number of kilometre squares in Natura 2000 countries where Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) has been recorded in the Netherlands.

Natura 2000 country

definite

possible

scope

  • Invasion procedure

Introduction outdoors cultivated land

SomeM. sinensisassortments produce voluminous sums of fertile seed ( Meyer and Tchida 1999 ) , a trait that confers a practical advantage in bioenergy systems ( Christian et Al. 2005 ; Yu et Al. 2009 ) . However,M. sinensisseed has the possible to scatter long distance by air current and air current dispersion is considered to be the primary method of spread of the species in USA ( Meyer, 2003 ) . Quinn et al. , 2011 stated that husbandmans and land directors should anticipate a big transportation of propagules from production Fieldss to environing countries The works is besides able to scatter through vegetive agencies. In suited conditions,M. sinensiscan distribute from gardens as rootstocks in garden waste or contaminated dirt. 4 centimeter long rhizome fragments can be used to propagate the species ( Nielsen, 1987 ) and smaller lengths may give rise to bases outside production secret plans ( Quinn et al. , 2011 ) . Harmonizing to CABI ( 2015 ) , all instances of debut and spread ofM. sinensishave been through planting as an ornamental and by the species going naturalised following garden flights ( CABI, 2015 ) . However,M. sinensishas already been introduced to countries outside production Fieldss in several parts of the universe e.g. the Eastern United States, and is considered a serious encroacher ( Quinn et al. , 2010 ; Jorgensen, 2011 ) . In the U.S.A, populations have established 100s of metres to several kilometres off from production Fieldss within short periods ( Quinn et al. 2010 ; Quinn et al. , 2011 ) .

M. sinensisis progressively being used as a possible biofuel species in Europe. In France in 2007, 600 hour angle were planted withMiscanthusspp. In Wales, 204 assortments were planted in the Ceredigion ( once Cardiganshire ) and plantations are good developed ( EPPO, 2015 ) . While there is some conflicting information over the ability of different cultivars to bring forth seed ( Morisawa, 1999 ) , observations from 1996 of a figure of cultivars planted in Ireland suggest that fertile seed production is common ( Scally et al. , 2001 ; CABI, 2015 ) . Seedlings have been observed around trial secret plans in a figure of conditions in Germany ( Martin Deuter, personal communicating in Jorgensen, 2011 ) and in ruderal grassland in the Czech Republic ( Pysek et al. , 2002 ) . Furthermore, flights have been noted in the Voralberg vale, Austria, where spread occurred along a river ; and in France where the species escaped from urban plantations in La Roche-sur-Yon ( EPPO, 2015 ) . Therefore there is grounds to bespeak that seed dispersion is besides a possible hazard in Europe ( Jorgensen, 2011 ) . However, in Denmark,M. sinensishas non spread from limited countries where it is grown as a thatching stuff ( Stewart et al. , 2009 ; Jorgensen, 2011 ) . In most old ages, the clime in Denmark is excessively cold for important seed production but this may alter with future clime alteration ( Jorgensen, 2011 ) .

Constitution

M. sinensisfrequently colonises ruderal, disturbed and urban countries ( ISSG, 2015 ) . It is frequently found on waysides, along railroads, power-lines, shores of reservoirs forest borders, sides of reservoirs, and in old Fieldss following fires ( Morisawa, 1999 ; CABI, 2015 ; The Bugwood Network, 2003 ; ISSG, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015 ) .

Spread

In its native Japan,M. sinensisis a pioneering species in to a great extent disturbed home grounds ( Hirata et al. , 2007 ) , and forest locations where clear-cutting occurs ( Inoue, 2003 ) . This occurs peculiarly where direction intercession prevents passage to forest ( e.g. combustion ) ( Stewart et al. , 2009 ; Quinn et al. , 2010 ) .M. sinensisfruits ( grains ) are known to be dispersed by air current in native grasslands ( Ohtsuka et al. , 1993 ; Quinn et al. , 2011 ) .

M. sinensisspread is significantly affected by air current velocity ( Quinn et al. , 2011 ) , and this may be reflected in the consequences of research analyzingM. sinensisdispersion. A survey by Nishiwaki & A ; Sugawara ( 1993 ) in native grasslands showed an exponential diminution in the figure of seeds with distance from the beginning works and a maximal seed travel of 20 m. However, another survey found that 95 % and 0.4 % of spines dispersed within 50 m and between 300 and 400 m severally ( Smith & A ; Barney, 2014, EPPO, 2015 ) . Seeds may besides be dispersed via machinery and vehicles, spread by hydrochory or in dirt ( Harley, 2007 ; EPPO, 2015 ; CABI, 2015 ) .

  • Environmental Impacts sum-up.

DiTomaso & A ; Healy ( 2007 ) province thatM. sinensishas a fecund history of naturalisation and environmental debasement. The works is described as an invasive species in North America and Europe due to its wide environmental tolerances, fast growing rate and high production of air current dispersed seeds ( Tateno, 1995 ; Barney & A ; DiTomaso, 2008 ) .

Available hazard appraisals and categorizations

A sum-up of hazard categorizations forM. sinensisis presented in Table 3.x.M. sinensiswas added to theEuropean Plant Protection Organisation(EPPO ) Alert Listin 2011. Justification for this was that the works should be monitored because it had shown invasive behavior outside the EPPO part and was progressively being planted in Europe while no hazard analyses had been carried ( EPPO, 2015 ) .M. sinensiswas rejected for debut in Italy following the application of an altered version of the Australian Weed Risk Assessment ( WRA ) ( Crosti et al. , 2010 ) . A hazard prioritisation procedure carried out for New York ( U.S.A. ) categorisedM. sinensisas a high hazard species.

Table 3.ten:Overview of hazard categorizations antecedently performed for Chinese Ag grass (Miscanthus sinensis) .

EPPO part

Italy

U.S.A. ( New York )

Scope

Hazard prioritisation

Hazard appraisal

Hazard prioritisation

Method

EPPO prioritization procedure for invasive foreigner workss

Adapted Australian weed hazard appraisal

New York non-native works invasiveness superior process

Year

2011

2010

2010

Hazard categorization

Alert list

Rejected

High ( 77.78 )

Beginning

www.eppo.int

Crosti et Al. ( 2010 )

New York invasive species information

Particularly in the U.S.A. ,M. sinensisis progressively being classified as an invasive species by horticulturalists industry ( Meyer & A ; Tchida, 1999 ; Peters et al. , 2006 ; Wilson & A ; Knox, 2006 ) , floristic databases ( EDDMaps, 2010 ; USDA NRCS, 2010 ) , province and regional invasive works councils ( SEEPPC, 2010 ) , and the United States Forest Service ( Miller et al. , 2004 ; USDA Forest Service, 2006 ) .

Effectss on environmental marks or native species

No information on the potentially parasitic effects ofM. sinensisor effects associating to the hosting pathogens or parasites on environmental marks or native species could be found during a hunt of available literature.

Competition

M. sinensisis a fast turning grass that can cut down the photosynthetic capacity of other workss by cut downing light handiness at the dirt surface ( D’Antonio & A ; Vitousek, 1992 ; EPPO, 2015 ) . In Japan,M. sinensisestablishes in abandoned Fieldss, suppressing the constitution of oak seedlings by cut downing their day-to-day C addition and the handiness of visible radiation. Swearingenet Al. ( 2002 ) province that in the middle Atlantic part of the U.S.A. ,M. sinensissignifiers brushs which prevent the growing of other workss at waysides, forest borders and glades ( ISSG, 2015 ) .

Crossbreeding

Quinn et Al. ( 2010 ) province that hybridization between cultivatedM. sinensisand wild populations can non be predicted, but stairss can be taken to cut down the potency for cistron flow.

Effectss on ecosystem map marks

No information on the effects ofM. sinensison the biotic belongingss of ecosystems could be found during a hunt of available literature.

Abiotic belongingss e.g. alimentary cycling, structural alteration

Potential betterments or decreases in biodiversity will depend on the land usage thatM. sinensisreplacements, together with harvest direction patterns.M. sinensisFieldss may better biodiversity in intensively agricultural landscapes due to decreased pesticide degree, a deficiency of tilling, and the proviso of concealment topographic points, peculiarly during winter ( Semere & A ; Slater, 2007 ; Bellamy et al. , 2009 ; Jorgensen, 2011 ) .

Effectss on works marks in cultivation systems

No information on the parasitic effects ofM. sinensison works marks or the effects of crossbreeding betweenM. sinensisand works marks in cultivation systems

Competition

In its native Japan,M. sinensisis a innovator species in immature tree plantations ( Hirata et al. , 2007 ) .

Pathogens or parasites

M. sinensispotentially carries several pathogens, for illustration, the barley xanthous midget luteovirus-PAV, barley xanthous midget luteovirus-MAV and cereal xanthous midget luteovirus ( Harriset al. , 2000 ; ISSG, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015 ) . In its native scope,M. sinensisis known to intercede interactions between harvests and their plagues ( Spencer, 2009 ) .

Effectss on carnal wellness and production marks

No information on the possible effects ofM. sinensison carnal wellness and production marks could be found during the literature survey.

Human marks

No information on the possible effects ofM. sinensison human marks could be found during the literature survey.

Effectss on other marks

  • Damage tosubstructure, bank and dike stableness etc.

M. sinensisbecomes extremely flammable when dry and can go a fire jeopardy when to the full aging ( Swearingenet al.,2002 ; ISSG, 2015 ; EPPO, 2015 ) . However, the hazard of fire is comparatively low in the humid clime of Northern Europe ( Jorgensen, 2011 ) . When on fire combustion fragments can do control hard ( Morisawa, 1999 ; CABI, 2015 ) .

  • Management

Cite this Energy crops factsheet: Miscanthus

Energy crops factsheet: Miscanthus. (2017, Jul 06). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/energy-crops-factsheet-miscanthus/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page