Get help now

Pro-Child / Pro-Choice: An Exercise in Doublethink? by Judith A. Boss

  • Pages 2
  • Words 396
  • Views 469
  • dovnload



  • Pages 2
  • Words 396
  • Views 469
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    In her essay “Pro-Child / Pro-Choice: An Exercise in Doublethink?” Judith A. Boss deconstructs the argument supporting legalized abortion on the basis that it is beneficial to children in general. Boss presents the oft-used slogan of the pro-choice position, “Pro-Child / Pro-Choice”. She maintains that this slogan seems closely related to “newspeak”, which she characterizes as “…vocabulary pared down to a minimum so that whole ideologies are expressed in a single slogan…” (156-7). The term “newspeak” comes from George Orwell’s 1984. In the novel, these simplistic slogans serve to perpetuate “doublethink”, which entails, as Orwell writes, “holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously and accepting both of them” (156). Boss also explains, “Doublethink is maintained by a refusal to examine the assumptions and facts supporting one’s beliefs” (156). In order to weaken the pro-child/pro-choice position, Boss begins by presenting the “assumptions and facts” supporting it. Boss states that the basic assumption behind the pro-child /pro-choice position is the belief that “…the exclusion of humans prior to birth from the protection of the moral and legal community, thereby leaving the choice of carrying a pregnancy to term entirely up to the woman, benefits children” (157). Boss creates two categories of children and presents the possible benefits that abortion-on-demand provides. The first category, the unborn child, benefits because his or her “… abortion will spare him or her a life of misery” (157). On the other hand, the second category, the born child, benefits because he or she “can enjoy a higher quality of life and paternal love unhindered by the presence of burdensome siblings who were.

    . .recognizes that the true utility that legalized abortion serves may lie in the benefits that it presents to women and that those benefits may appear in the form of social empowerment. It does seem that since 1973, women have been able to empower themselves in the occupational realm. However, Boss leads us to ask ourselves if this professional empowerment of women has come at any cost. In order to understand the true utility of allowing abortion-on-demand, one must weigh all the consequences it creates. It seems though that we have not appropriately measured the consequences of ensuring abortion-on-demand. Questions: How is doublethink mutually exclusive with the correct use of utilitarian theory? What positive consequences, if any, come from ensuring abortion-on-demand? How does one ensure that every child is a healthy child? Is it even possible?

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Pro-Child / Pro-Choice: An Exercise in Doublethink? by Judith A. Boss. (2018, Feb 03). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy