What is terrorist act? Although it is hard to come to a cosmopolitan definition of terrorist act, it can be described as warfare affecting the usage or menace of force, typically against an influential noncombatant mark, with the thought of making fright in a wide audience ( Domestic Terrorism 1 ) . Terrorism emerges when a group of terrorists want to acquire their message across to a group of people with higher power, normally a authorities. The end of the terrorists is to contend for rights, anti-imperialism, or any other cause deemed of import by the group ( Global Terrorism ) . The war on terrorist act has been traveling on since the beginning of civilisation.
Terrorism onslaughts occur really frequently throughout the universe, normally at least one about every twenty-four hours. Occasionally the onslaughts make headlines worldwide. One of the most celebrated and well-known terrorist onslaughts took topographic point on September 11, 2001. A terrorist group from the Middle East known as al-Qaeda flew planes into the Twin Tower edifices located in the United States. Many people were killed and it was a annihilating twenty-four hours for the United States. To forestall onslaughts such as this from go oning once more, the pattern of extraordinary rendering was adopted by the United States. Extraordinary rendering can be defined as snatch alleged terrorists from their fatherland or another state and keeping them for oppugning in close bases located throughout the state ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . Although the war on terrorist act requires safeguards, extraordinary rendering is morally incorrect due to the fact that it is non ever effectual and it involves rough tactics.
Extraordinary rendering has been practiced by the United States C.I.A. for about 9 old ages. Before the September 11th terrorist onslaught in New York, there were patterns used to obtain terrorists. However, these patterns were non legalized until after the September 11th onslaughts. The declared intent of extraordinary rendering is to obtain terrorists before they launch an onslaught ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . This pattern is difficult to warrant since the authorities normally does non hold solid grounds turn outing if the suspect is a terrorist prior to taking him surety.
Surprisingly, extraordinary rendering is considered to be legal by the United States authorities. Ironically, this pattern is non governed by any jurisprudence ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . It is believed to be a necessary maneuver in the war against terrorist act. The patterns used by the C.I.A. be given to be really rough, but they are overlooked and considered to be non-torturous ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . However, memos were leaked that showed grounds of violent patterns used in question ( A cleft in the wall of secrecy 1 ) . Extraordinary rendering is normally referred to as merely a safeguard and nil more ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . On the other manus, if we take a individual surety and cruelly torment them for information they might non possess, would n’t that do us terrorists as good?
Other states seem to hold that extraordinary rendering is n’t a moral maneuver. Throughout the universe, it is to a great extent criticized ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . The method of extraordinary rendering combines two illegal patterns to do a “ legal ” pattern. States throughout the universe believe it is incorrect due to the fact that it involves nobbling and torture, both offenses that are punishable under federal and international jurisprudence ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . It is dual criterion that the authorities is allowed to nobble and mistreat people ; if a felon were to make so, he ‘d be convicted.
Harsh tactics are one of the C.I.A. ‘s top ways to obtain information from suspects. Possible terrorists are normally captured by the C.I.A. and either interrogated on United States dirt or sent to another state to be questioned ( The jurisprudence: “ extraordinary rendering ” and presidential decree. 8 ) . Although that sounds safe, many of the foreign states will utilize the anguish method in order to obtain their information. For illustration, Egypt, Syria and Morocco have been identified as normally utilizing anguish on their victims ( Extraordinary Rendition 1 ) . The current estimation figure of captives is in the 100s. As if that is n’t bad plenty, the authorities did non hold warrants to take these captives surety. The authorities merely believed the captives were terrorists, and decided that their “ intuition ” is good plenty concluding to collar them.
In add-on to presuming people are terrorists, the techniques they use to get information are rather hideous. A normally used maneuver is called waterboarding. Waterboarding is when H2O is inserted into the captive ‘s lungs, ensuing in him fearing the possibility of submerging. It is believed that this would do him to uncover information he would non under ordinary fortunes. The authorities considers it to be a absolutely moral and legal pattern. For illustration, Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of province during President George Bush ‘s term, stated that this pattern is wholly acceptable and that the captives are treated with cordial reception ( Extraordinary rendering and the rewards of hypocrisy 1 ) . It is clear that the United States has a slender definition of anguish, and the abusing of the supposed terrorists is overlooked.
In add-on to waterboarding, the C.I.A. besides uses the long clip standing technique. This entails the captive being forced to stand while their custodies and pess are shackled. Their pess are so shackled to the floor every bit good. The individual is so left to stand at that place until they become dog-tired of standing and state the authorities the information they seek. The C.I.A. provinces that the exhaustion and sleep want is what makes the victim reveals information. They are so hallucinating they do non recognize they are leaking “ of import secrets ” . The long clip standing pattern is said to be one of the most effectual in obtaining information from obstinate suspects.
Although the techniques can be helpful, extraordinary rendering itself is non ever effectual. This pattern involves taking the alleged terrorist surety, and so interrogating him, normally with anguish if he is non openly willing to uncover information with simple inquiries. If the captive is deemed to be guiltless, he is so set free. Many times this occurs, and the authorities merely states they had the “ incorrect cat ” . However, what if he truly was a terrorist, and was merely really good at lying? There is no manner to be certain that what the captive is uncovering is accurate information, and that it is non merely a underhand maneuver to remain alive. At the same clip, what if the authorities decides the captive is a terrorist when he is genuinely guiltless?
On legion occasions, guiltless people are accused of being terrorists or being involved in terrorist activities. For illustration Benamar Benatta fled his place state of Algeria on September 5th, 2001 because he feared decease in his fatherland. Benatta so settled in Canada. He was taken confined the dark after the September 11th onslaught in New York City. Without being offered the opportunity to attest against his gaining control or being told where he was being taken, the Canadian constabularies drove him over the boundary line and handed him over to the Americans to be questioned. The lone ground he was thought to be a terrorist was because he was a Muslim and he had one time served in the Algerian military. However, this accusal was false. Benatta spent about three old ages in prison where he claims he was tortured. He was eventually released on July 20, 2003 and allowed to return to Canada. Although he is now a free adult male, he says this incident will stalk him for the remainder of his life ( Bitter anniversary for rendering victim 1 ) .
Another saddening illustration of an guiltless individual being taken surety is the narrative of Binyam Mohamed. He was a 32 twelvemonth old adult male of Ethiopian descent who came to the United Kingdom to happen safety. Mohamed was a cleansing agent who lived in London. He went on a trip to Pakistan and Afghanistan where he was arrested at the Karachi airdrome. Harmonizing to beginnings, Mohamed was believed to be a member of the Taliban. Mohamed claims that he was taken around the universe and tortured by functionaries who thought he was concealing information. Subsequently on, Mohamed was deemed guiltless and released from prison. ( Bill for settling Guantanamo Bay ‘torture ‘ instances could exceed [ lbs sterling ] 30m 2 ) .
Richard Belmar was a British citizen. He converted to Islam in his teenage old ages and coincidentally traveled to Pakistan right before the September 11th incident. He was captured in Pakistan. Later on, Belmar was taken to other topographic points such as Bagram and Guantnamo where he claims he was mistreated by the functionaries interrogating him. Belmar was finally released in January of 2005 without charge ( Bill for settling Guantanamo Bay ‘torture ‘ instances could exceed [ lbs sterling ] 30m 2 ) . These are merely a few instances where an guiltless individual was misfortunate and accused of being a terrorist ; there are many other cases known all around the universe.
Many of these sureties were merely considered to be members of a terrorist group based on their background. Binyam was detained because he was Ethiopian. Belmar was arrested based on his spiritual background ( Bill for settling Guantanamo Bay ‘torture ‘ instances could exceed [ lbs sterling ] 30m 2 ) . Mohamed was accused merely because he was Muslim ( Bitter anniversary for rendering victim ) . Just because person is of foreign descent and lives in another state does non intend they are at that place for terroristic grounds. For illustration, when tramps from the United States were captured in Iran, the United States authorities thought it was pathetic and believed they should be set free instantly. What they failed to recognize is they tend to make the same thing to any aliens in the United States that appear “ leery ” . It is quite racialist of the United States to aim people from the Middle East as possible terrorist suspects. In the U.S. each twelvemonth, many of its ain native citizens are in cahoots with terrorists all over the universe. Why are n’t these people targeted as good? Is it merely because they were born in the United States?
There is non ever clear grounds that the suspect is a terrorist. When the authorities detains person as a terrorist suspect, it is frequently within a few yearss after a terrorist onslaught. On the other manus, if they are travel rapidlying to happen possible suspects, they are likely believing irrationally. Most likely they do non even execute a thorough background cheque on the suspect. It would take more than a few yearss to make so, and some of these victims are taken the twenty-four hours after or even the twenty-four hours of an onslaught. On many occasions, such as the 1s above, there is no cogent evidence that the prisoner is a terrorist ( Bill for settling Guntanamo Bay ‘torture ‘ instances could exceed [ lbs sterling ] 30m 2 ) . If this is the instance, they are set free, normally after being pointlessly tortured.
To sum it all up, extraordinary rendering is non a reliable technique to obtain information from suspects. It seems to hold more negative effects than good. Although it is a smart thought to seek and forestall terrorist onslaughts from happening, possibly the authorities should believe more rationally. Before confining person, a thorough and complete background cheque is needed. There besides must be solid grounds and good logical thinking to warrant taking a individual surety.
Furthermore, something must be done about the rough question techniques. We can non maintain overlooking them as “ necessary in the war against terrorist act ” . These techniques may be helpful, but there are more humane and every bit effectual ways to obtain information. For illustration, alternatively of controlled drowning, functionaries could seek calmly concluding with the suspects. Although it seems as if this would non be effectual, it has been proven to work in ordinary condemnable probes. Harming a suspect may do them forbear from stating any helpful information they might possess. Doing so might besides arouse hatred for the United States. Benamar Benatta, a adult male who did non demo hatred for the United States prior to his detention, appeared to experience acrimonious bitterness towards the U.S. after his three twelvemonth imprisonment ( Bitter anniversary for rendering victim 1-2 ) . Even if an guiltless suspect was n’t antecedently involved in any terrorist onslaughts, it might oblige him to get down acquiring involved to acquire his retaliation. All in all, by utilizing this technique the United States may be fostering their susceptibleness of being attacked. Therefore, this proves that the pattern of extraordinary rendering is deficient, seeing as it may really decline the opportunities of terrorist onslaughts happening alternatively of cut downing them.