Get help now

Ginny’s Restaurant Case

  • Pages 2
  • Words 308
  • Views 217
  • dovnload

    Download

    Cite

  • Pages 2
  • Words 308
  • Views 217
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Valuation of Virginia’s assets

    Present value: PV = $2,000,000 + $3,000,000/(1+0. 06)1 = $2,000,000 + $2,830,189 = $4,830,189

    Future Value (1 year): FV = 2,000,000(1+0. 06)1 + 3,000,000 = 2,120,000 + 3,000,000 = 5,120,000

    Valuation of Viginia’s assets with investment

    $1 million investment PV = $1,800,000/(1+0. 06)1 + $3,000,000 = $1,698,113 + $3,000,000 = $4,698,113

    $2 million investment PV = $3,300,000/(1+0. 06)1 + $2,000,000 = $3,113,208 + $2,000,000 = $5,113,208

    $ 3 million investment PV = $4,400,000/(1+0. 06)1 + $1,000,000 = $4,150,943 + $1,000,000 = $5,150,943

    $4 million investment PV = $5,400,000/(1+0. 6)1 = $5,094,340 Virginia’s optimal investment in the restaurant is $3 million, which give her a total of $5,150,943 at the end of year 1. This is approximately a 29% increase in her wealth.

    PV of investment with $2. 8m borrowed

    FV= Restaurant Future Cash flows – [Principle(1+0. 06)] = $4,400,000 – [$2,800,000(1. 06)] = $4,400,000 – $2,968,000 = $1,432,000 PV = $1,432,000/1. 06 = $1,350,943 Assuming that Virginia can borrow the balance of the $3 million investment at a 6% interest rate, she should make the investment regardless.

    PV of investment with $3m borrowed

    FV = Restaurant Future Cash flows – [Principle(1+0. 06)] $4,400,000 – [$3,000,000(1. 06)] = $4,400,000 – $3,180,000 = $1,220,000 = $1,220,000/1. 06 PV= $1,150,943 Yes, she should still make the investment as it will net her $1,150,000.

    Assuming both are rational, it is in the best interest of both the savers and the spenders to invest $3 million in the restaurant. While the savers are likely to reinvest their earnings from the investment, the spenders would take out a loan in the amount of their share of the future value of the investment less the interest rate allowing them to spend the money in the present and profit from the spread between the interest rate and return. If the spenders refused to invest, they would have less money to spend in the present day, which is no rationale.

    Ham business investment

    PV = $3,400,000/(1+0. 06)1 = 3,207,547 NPV = 3,207,547 – 2,500,000 = 707,547

    While the project generates a positive net present value, I don’t recommend the investment in the ham business. The only way to invest in the Ham business without borrowing money or using the companies retained earnings would be to issue 357,143 new shares at the current $7 per share price. However, the valuation of the company (per share) would drop to $2. 87 per share after the Ham company investment and thus it is not in the best interest of the shareholders to make this investment.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Ginny’s Restaurant Case. (2019, May 01). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/ginnys-restaurant-case/

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy