Gun Control Essay
20 October 2010
On April 16, 2007, the Virginia Tech campus had the worst shooting in the American history. Around 7:15 a.m. in the morning, the murderer first opened fire in a dormitory, killing two people and injuring the many others. About two hours later, he shot thirty people, injured more than ten people, and then committed suicide. Thirty-three bright lives instantaneously vanished (CNN newsroom). People strongly condemned the shooter, expressed condolences, and started social reflections. Some from a campus security perspective, some from human rights perspective, some from college students’ mental health point of view. Naturally, the greatest number of reflection and criticism is on the American gun control system. Why not ban guns? As early as 1968, the U.S Government has issued a national law that regulates gun control. Forty years later, the U.S Government has established many regulatations related to firearms control, but firearm violence has not been effectively curbed. Although there is a constitutional right for Americans to own guns for protection, regulation of gun ownership through strict law is necessary to minimize violent crime and reduce resulting medical costs.
Despite the overwhelming evidence that guns kill people, there are those who argue the opposite, saying that it is people who kill people and that the “right to bear arms” is a fundamental right. Guns increase violence and increase the crime rate because more people are murdered with guns than they are saved with guns. Those against stricter gun control believe that gun control laws violate the Second Amendment of our Constitution. The National Rifle Association (NRA) adamently asserts that American citizens have a right to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from harm because the Second Amendment of the Constitution states that ” the.
Gun Control Essay
Victoria Kyllo Patrick Chambers English 101 9 April 2013 Position Paper Does the United States need more stringent gun control? This is a question that has been sparking nationwide in America. Gun control is simply defined as a regulation of selling, owning, and use of guns. This debate has many arguments saying that the U.
S should have stricter gun laws to prevent fewer crimes or some even say to abolish the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and others argue that the U. S does not need any more laws to strict guns away from U. S citizens (Sowell).People for more gun control laws feel that the government needs to take action by doing better background checks, ban weapons such as assault rifles, handguns, and high-capacity ammunition.
People against gun control laws perceive that these laws are unconstitutional because they violate the Second Amendment (Borade). The U. S. does not need any more stringent gun control laws because crime is always going to happen no matter what, in the past the government has put restrictions on firearms but there are still gun crimes being committed.
So why do people own guns?Statistics show that there are roughly 307 million people in the United States and around 300 million firearms are owned by U. S civilians (Agresti and Smith). Based on surveys, gun owners were asked why they own guns. 67% stated that they own guns for protection against crime, the other 33% said no for protection against crime, 66% said target shooting, the other 34% said no for target shooting and 58% said hunting, the other 42% said no to hunting (Agresti and Smith).
These being the main reasons why people own guns, why should there be stricter gun control laws?Even so, why do some people say that the U. S. Government needs to abolish the Second Amendment? The Second Amendment clearly states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (GunCite). The clear purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve and guarantee and have the ability to protect ourselves against all enemies foreign and domestic (GunCite).
Also, society will not become safer by restricting gun ownership as “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” (Borade).Guns are not the only reason why people die or get injured, it can be caused by the use of a knife, car accident, or even overdosing on drugs. According to the National Rifle Association “there is no empirical, statistical, any type of evidence whatsoever that can be proved (National Rifle Association). Nobody can predict the future of what will happen to people whether it’s a homicide, rape, car accident, or drugs.
Many people believe that with stricter gun laws there will be fewer crimes (McDonough). They think that a gun is a lethal weapon and its only function is to kill (Samakow).After many cases including the Aurora, Colorado movie theater and the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting many people were protesting about stricter gun laws such as increased background checks, and banning semi-automatic weapons and handguns (Debate). Others also believe that semi-automatic weapons are intended for military use only and have no business in the hands of civilians for either self-protection or sport and would imply that if the Second Amendment of the U.
S Constitution is repealed then there will be the non-existent ability to acquire a gun then there will be less direct and indirect violence (Winkler).First of all, a firearm is a lethal weapon but it’s not only a function of just to kill. Guns are only deadly if used for its intended purpose. President Obama made it clear that he does not want to repeal the Second Amendment but wants to ban assault weapons, handguns, high-capacity ammunition, and increased background check protocols (Debate).
President Obama does have a point, why does an average U. S citizen need an assault weapon with high-capacity ammunition, what would they use it for, it’s not like they are trying to take down a big mob of enemy soldiers in the U. S.Stronger background checks do need to be enforced in gun sales, such as looking if the buyer is convicted of a felony, a user of illegal drugs or an addict, involuntarily committed to a mental institution, and even an illegal alien.
There is no need to repeal the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution; U. S citizens have the right to keep a firearm in their household for whatever reason need be (GunCite). The point that does not make sense is to ban handguns; a handgun is a smaller version of a firearm with less ammunition capacity, it seems to be the perfect weapon to use in a self-defense situation.In conclusion, does the United States need more stringent gun control? It is very hard to predict how many lives will be saved, either in situation involving firearms, vehicles, or drugs.
If stricter gun laws need to be passed than the only laws that really need to be enforced are increased background checks, banning of assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition. There is no need to prohibit the Second Amendment of the U. S Constitution. It was billed for a reason and the main reason is for protection against crime.
As shown in the statistics above, 67% said yes they own a gun for protection, 66% said yes for target shooting, and 58% said yes for hunting (Agresti and Smith). If the Second Amendment is prohibited then there will be an even bigger issue to debate over again. Banning handguns is also a meaningless attribution. How are people going to defend themselves if a burglar walks in with a gun and the victim has no weapon, then what? Works Cited Agresti, James D.
and Reid K. Smith. “Just Facts. ” 13 September 2010.
Gun Control Facts. <http://justfacts. com/guncontrol. asp>.
The Just Facts website on gun control gives general information on what gun control is all about, gives great definitions, and provides statistics on how many people in the U. S own a weapon and for what reason. Also, it reports statistics on the number of murders committed in the U. S.
and gives comprehension on which states in American have rights to carry a firearm in public. This web page includes enough information to help me broaden my own argument against gun control. Borade, Gaynor. “Pros and Cons of Gun Control.
” 31 January 2012. Buzzle. <http://www. buzzle.
com/articles/pros and cons of gun control>.This document on Buzzle gives an understanding of why gun control exists and gives specific explanations of why gun control is needed and why gun control is not needed. It also shows the role on how law enforcers need to act in proposing these gun control laws to the public. The main point Borade is trying to state is that it’s the responsibility of every citizen to determine for he or she whether or not the acquisition of arms is good for society.
This is a great document that provides very admirable examples for counterarguments and my own arguments. Debate, Club. U. S News and World Reports.
013. ;lt;http://www. usnews. com/debate/ should obamas gun control protocals be enacted;gt;.
This debate report on U. S News and World Report discusses that after the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting the whole U. S. nation was shocked and has begun protesting for stricter gun control laws.
President Obama clearly addresses his opinion that Congress needs to pass legislation in which will increase stronger background check protocols, ban assault weapons, and high-capacity ammunition. The President also made it very clear that he does not want abolish the Second Amendment of the U.S Constitution because he believes it guarantees and individuals right to bear arms. This source seems good for ideas about counterarguments and my opinion as well.
GunCite. February 2013. ;lt;http://www. guncite.
com;gt;. This website provides many links to find information about the Second Amendment, such as what it is, and its purpose. Also, gives a statistical perspective on how often guns are used in self-defense, concealed carry laws, homicides, suicides, accidents, and even research studies on gun control. It’s a great source that includes a lot of information that can be used for my own arguments and counterarguments as well.
McDonough, Katie. “Gun control reduces gun violence and other studies that confirm the obvious. ” Salon March 2013. Katie McDonough explains in this article that gun control actually reduces violence and there have been studies that prove it to be true.
She clearly explains that researchers have found that states with more gun control laws experience less gun violence and fewer firearm deaths than with states without similar regulations. She also explains a same research study done by Harvard University and the Boston Children’s Hospital have also found that with stronger gun control laws, crime is reduced.This source seems good for counterarguments but in my opinion these studies are a joke. No one can predict who is going to get shot or not, it’s just life and that is what happens.
National Rifle Association. 2013. <http://nra. org>.
This website provides information about the National Rifle Association stating that this is an American organization founded in 1871 that promotes the rights of citizens to bear arms, as well as firearm safety, marksmanship, hunting, and self-defense training in the U. S. This site provides many links to news, politics, military, law enforcement, and many events.The National Rifle Association is a great source that has provided information to expand my view on the whole gun control debate.
It really provides enough information why the U. S does not need gun control. Samakow, Paul. “Guns and Gun Control: We must agree.
” The Washington Times 9 February 2013. Paul Samakow writes about how the whole debate between gun control evokes high emotion and opposition. Paul goes about this article on both sides of the debate talking that guns facilitate killing and are very dangerous and then writes how guns are good for protection.Near then of the article Paul explains why we all must agree to why we need stricter gun control laws and with these stricter laws it will help protect our society in the future.
I found some points in this article to be helpful but not very obvious. Sowell, Thomas. “Do Gun Control Laws Control Guns? ” 2013. Thomas Sowell gives a good article about gun control laws and if they actually work.
He talks about boiling down to a question: what are the facts? If the facts show that gun control works then we need gun control but if the facts show that it has not worked then we don’t need gun control.This was a great article to use to help explain the whole debate issue in the introduction. Winkler, Adam. “The Second Amendment is all for gun control.
” Newsweek February 2013. Adam Winkler writes an article about how the government needs to take back the Second Amendment. Without the Second Amendment then there will be no guns to purchase and then there will be less crime committed in the U. S.
The information from this article has good views to use for counterarguments.