Through culture, religion and representation the tiger is seen in many different ways. Scapegoating, the sacrificial victim and the history of mimetic rivalry all involve these many different ideas. Elsie Cloete digs through the idea of animot and the perception of “absolute hospitality” as regards to the other. Her article “Tigers, Humans and Animots” prove her research and focus on Yann Martel’s Life of Pi (2003). Elsie demonstrates in general , comparing and contrasting each idea, depending at which end you are standing, sometimes finding yourself at different ends at the same time.
She parallels all of the diiferent points of view clearly into detail, step by step to how these ideas develop. She illustrates how tigers are the most highly developed in the animal kingdom. At first it seemed very confusing asking what did all this have to do with how a tiger is seen between culture and religion. After going through the whole article it all made sense to why she goes into very deep characteristics of the tiger and its representation.
For example: it is comprehended that some governments symbolize victory through a tiger as opposed to others who sees it as destruction.
Another thing acknowledged is that tigers can be tamed bringing a whole other form of representation. What Elsie is trying to prove is that it depends on humans culture and religion to the way they see others and things in general. Every being is different whether it be animal , or human. No one knows what it is actually like to be the other. We like to assume in overall that all of the same kind are the same depending on species per say. Elsie Cloete is trying to point out that every living thing is a different world yet are still a being for that sole fact.
Is she really questioning how humans see others and other species? Subsequently analyzing her thoughts one could say that she is wrong. Her research on Elizabeth Costello shows how humans cannot imajine themselves in someone elses reality being the same species neither much less will humans understand what it is like to be an animal. Cloetes starts to make more since and clear on what she is talking about using the ideas of Rene Girard. His ideas involve mainly culture and religion. Examples of scarifying in religion depending on culture are made ery clear making it easy to understand her point of view. She proves how humans cannot compare to animals because it is seen wrong. Talking about the word animot she goes into depth and detail about what it means. Corresponding to its origins and meanings she is very specific, maybe was a bit too much about this word. After all shes been talking about, where on earth does The life of Pi have to do with anything she is talking about? Well in order to bring up the story she wanted to make very clear what these ideas were and how they would apply to The Life of Pi.
She points out how in story this boy of three religions stays alive using his beliefs. Explaining very well how we understand each other based on animal culture and religion like in the book. Analogizing the ideas with the story helps make it much more understandable to what her theory is. Using the story, she sets examples as she is defining both the tiger (Richard Parker) and Pi. Also pointed out is how humans do not like to face the reality and prefer to sugar coat it making it a lie. Elsie makes evident how humans can be just as animalistic when forced to in a bad situation like Pi’s.
The illustration she gives is put beyond doubt. There are many thuing I agree with Elsie Cloete. Even though she gave great examples of all the ideas there are still parts that I cannot fully relate too. The reason maybe that sometimes we have to be in that situation, to actually become a believer of what we truly are. Also question ourselves if we are actually all that different from animals. I strongly agree on how culture and religion gives us different meanings to what we think is but are faced to true reality.
Cite this How Tigers, Humans and Animots Is Analyzed Through Yann Martel’s Life of Pi
How Tigers, Humans and Animots Is Analyzed Through Yann Martel’s Life of Pi. (2017, Jan 06). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/how-tigers-humans-and-animots-is-analyzed-through-yann-martels-life-of-pi/