Our group foremost read the drama of Little Red Riding Hood by the Grimm Brothers in our seminar ; we so had a group treatment about what we each idea were the chief subjects that stood out to us. and thoughts of how to portray them through our public presentation. We came up with:
1. Temptation2. Desire3. Frustration4. Anger5. Seduction6. Decision doing / taking the right way
I looked into other international versions of the drama. for illustration Lon Po Po is the Chinese version written by Ed Young. besides Small Red Hat written in Italy/Austria. and three chief subjects stood out to me. taking the right way. seduction and enticement.
I besides read Politically Correct Bedtime Narratives by James Finn Garner. and this version truly made me believe about societal and cultural issues that have influenced this narrative. this narrative was first written in a clip without equal rights and political equity. and this version shows how our society has changed an adapted this narrative. when foremost written this narrative had one lesson for immature kids to maneuver off from aliens. this because of our society today has changed. into a more sexist version of immature misss remaining off from work forces. and how work forces can be unsafe and violent.
These issues that have changed because of society. stood out to me. and I wanted to make a modern version with the same issues. nevertheless non holding a sexy position. I believe adult females can score work forces. giving incorrect feelings. doing a adult male frustrated or the other manner around. and force can come from both sexes excessively.
We had four chief characters two male childs and two misss. and a job we had to get the better of was how to demo our subjects through a narrative line. we wanted to hold a turn in the narrative to demo taking the right way. and the audience seeing the separate waies chosen by each character. A saloon set up ; is a typical topographic point were certain waies need to be chosen. I was a seducing miss. whilst my sister was an minor guiltless miss so the audience automatically felt it was her that something bad would go on to.
This is so were the societal issues came in. two boys taking place two misss. one that wanted to and one that didn’t. Our group so faced the job of how to demo these issues without being male chauvinist and bias. To get the better of this in the terminal each character portrayed a different subject. we showed that different waies can take to better or worse terminations. I seduced and ended up being the 1 who got hurt. which surprised the audience as Will was shown as the guiltless male child. who so turned violent. nevertheless Chloe eventually said no. take her right way. and Adam took her safely place.
A system we used was utilizing a storyteller. but besides utilizing her character to assist act upon our drama. We opened our drama with Sarah being our storyteller and stating our narrative. but as a Bar director of a saloon. so alternatively of being a storyteller who’s non in the drama. we managed to integrate her to play a large function of stating our narrative to the audience. another illustration is stating Chloe to do the right determination to travel place. which fitted really good. because as Sarah is a saloon director it would be normal for her to see intoxicated misss. traveling place with work forces. and Sarah influenced the determination for Chloe to travel place.
One scene that is used that I feel conveyed significance is between Will and me. when Will became violent. We conveyed this significance through the drama by invariably naming Will a “prick” devising Will angry. In our scene near the terminal I verbally abuse Will. and name him a “prick” . by this point his choler is excessively much as he has been called it many times. and he has eventually had sufficiency of being victimized an becomes violent towards me. although now the audience doesn’t see what Will did to me. it shows a significance to the audience of how people can alter being bullied as Will was the sort. amusing one and he was pressured into making something he didn’t want to make. and besides the incorrect way I had taken. as I didn’t walk off. I gave him maltreatment which wasn’t needed.
I feel that a failing that we could hold improved on. is the still images from scene to scene. as we needed to hold worked on being absolutely still and non traveling to do the drama look more realistic. Another failing is the knowing of the waiting lines to when our lines were. because we focused so much on what was traveling into the narrative line and subjects. through our actions is were our subjects were most shown. and line waiting lines were added after. if I did this once more I would do certain we did lines at the same clip to do the drama look more flowing.
The strengths of our drama. I think is how we showed our subjects. and how we kept the audience engaged. Through the drama there were parts of comedy and so parts of serious play. which kept the audience engaged and the subjects were shown all the manner through. Another strength would be I experience how we used our storyteller. Sarah was changed a batch as to get down with she wasn’t in the drama and merely a storyteller stating the narrative. but by seting Sarah in the drama it made our drama a batch stronger. and it made the dramas make a batch more sense. I’ve learnt that taking hazards and seeking out different methods before doing a concluding determination. is a good manner to see what looks incorrect and right and what influences and adds to the drama.
