Closing Down Napster is Not the Solution

Table of Content

About everyone has heard of Napster and its long debated issue s of file swapping and sharing. Sing Napster s ephemeral being of about a twelvemonth and a half, they have surely opened many people s eyes. Some say the file trading that Napster allows everyone to make is illegal; others says it s merely another thing to make on the cyberspace. Napster has done much good for the cyberspace, adding one more good thing that the cyberspace can make for us. Napster has raised several intense controversial issues in the music industry of copyright violation Torahs. Although closing down Napster is non the solution; some understanding between the complainants and Napster should come about.

Napster is a medium for trading and/or swapping of music files over the cyberspace. Napster has approximately 20 million users worldwide  . This phenomenon called Napster has taking the full cyberspace by storm. Just believe all Napster is, is a plan designed by a nineteen-year-old child, a college dropout. Who would hold thought that it would do so much exhilaration in the music industry  .

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Napster has allowed 1000000s of people to be able to portion their music over the cyberspace. In these 1000000s of people merchandising and trading music, there have been claims of illegal Acts of the Apostles being committed by the Napster users. The Godhead of Napster was summoned to tribunal, on copyright violation misdemeanors. Lars Ulrich, drummer for Metallic, brought on this case; Lars was really disquieted to happen out the people were merchandising their music with out them, Metallica, acquiring paid. This disquieted Lars and sent him on a mass meeting to acquire Napster closure.

With all this disturbance Napster s Godhead and interior decorator was dragged into tribunal to confront copyright violation cases. In Napster s defence, they claim that they are non perpetrating any illegal Acts of the Apostles, merely by allowing its member s portion files at their ain will. Napster is non doing

any money from these trades of music. They claim that utilizing Napster as an interchanging medium for music is exerting one First Amendment rights as a United States citizen. The U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel said that the lone ground Napster was created was to be able to merchandise copyrighted music, pirated online from other people. There has been an estimated 3.6 billion downloads of illegal, copyrighted stuff through Napster, this is the biggest of all copyright violation instances of all time in the history of the United States. On July 26, 2000, the terminal of the hearing against Napster, the justice had ruled Napster to be shutdown; an injunction against Napster was enforced .

A few yearss subsequently, July 28, 2000, Napster won in Appeals Court to respite the Napster shutdain, but to go forth it unfastened until the terminal of the concluding instance and case. Many different people are actioning Napster, but Metallica is the lone set suing, there are several people seeking to acquire Napster closure, because it is taking off from their concern and net incomes. Although the music industry is having more clients than of all time before, it is still non happy with the whole Napster thought ) .

After much treatment Napster wants to remain running, and all of its members want to maintain on utilizing the service excessively. One of the people actioning Napster claimed that if the Napster would allow Bertelsmann purchase into a piece of Napster, it would drop its case against Napster. The biggest argument traveling on now is how to maintain Napster running and seeking non interrupting any more copyright Torahs. There has been a great sum of talk of Napster users holding to pay a rank fee to utilize the service. This rank fee would travel to the record companies to pay a part of the royalties owed to the instrumentalists. The fee would be minimum, like $ 5 a month; this would do many record companies happy. This fee wouldn’t be a full royalty fee, but it is better than non acquiring any money at all .

Bertelsmann has a case against Napster; although he is a portion of BMG Music, He besides is seeking to organize an confederation with Napster to tackle the amazing potency of Napster. The new concern program that Napster is seeking to follow would bring forth a gross income of $ 30 to 50 million. Everyone is seeking to settle the Napster engagement out of tribunal, and they will acquire at that place finally  .

Closing down Napster is non the reply to the job; there will be several other companies merely like it to happen away around infringement cases. Napster has created much attending for merely interchanging music. I have used Napster and it s really cool. I can see that Napster has an unmeasurable potency for success. I besides agree with instrumentalists; they should be reward for their rational belongings, their music.

Plants Cited

  1. “Bertelsmann Says it Would Restart Napster if Closed.” Tech TV News ( 1 Nov. 2000 ) . Online. Available wysiwyg: //106http: //,3685,3009033,00.html ( 13 Nov. 2000 ) .
  2. Grimaldi, James V.” Napster Ordered to Shut Down Service Aids Piracy of Music, Judge Says.” Washington Post, The ( DC ) ( 27 July 2000 ) . Online. NewsBank. Available hypertext transfer protocol: // & A; RGD-20000727 & A; PROD=NNFB ( 13 Nov. 2000 ) .
  3. Stern, Christopher, and David Segal. “Napster Wins Reprieve from Court-Ordered Shutdown.” Washington Post, The ( DC ) ( 29 July 2000 ) . Online. NewBank. Available hypertext transfer protocol: // & A; RGD=20000729 & A; PROD=NNFB ( 13 Nov. 2000 ) .


Cite this page

Closing Down Napster is Not the Solution. (2017, Jul 13). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront