The Salem Witch Trials were a highly controversial period in history, characterized by suspicion and false accusations against innocent individuals. This resulted in widespread hysteria and chaos in Salem Village. The Crucible provides a dramatic representation of these trials, highlighting several similarities to the actual events. By examining these extraordinary occurrences, we can draw parallels to our own lives and avoid repeating the errors of the past.
In terms of the overall theme, The Crucible movie portrays several differences from the actual events but remains accurate. Notably, the relationship between John Proctor and Abigail Williams is portrayed as more intimate than it truly was. The movie suggests a romantic connection between them, significantly altering the plot. In reality, Proctor and Williams had no relationship beyond living in the same town before the witch trials. Another major divergence lies in the character of Giles Corey. In the film, he is pressed to death for refusing to disclose a name. However, in real life, Giles survives but is excommunicated from the church for his strong opposition to the hangings. The church later reinstates him in their scrolls. On the other hand, one similarity that stands out is Reverend Hale’s character. Initially seeking to assist the people with his church authority, he distances himself from the Salem Witch Trials as events spiral out of control. He becomes a staunch supporter of John Proctor. Additionally, the hysteria primarily originates in Mr. Samuel Parris’s home, involving his daughters and their friends following incidents of witchcraft in the woods.
Arthur Miller, the director of The Crucible, utilized his “artistic license” to enhance the drama and captivate viewers. While some may criticize this approach, I believe that the changes he made did not distort the historical accuracy of the Salem Witch Trials. The most significant alteration was the inclusion of a romantic relationship between Abigail Williams and John Proctor, which deviated from the true events. Nonetheless, I found this twist to be engaging. Despite a few deviations, Miller stayed faithful to the genuine story in terms of the hangings, important characters, and the origins and key players of the hysteria. Upon evaluating both similarities and differences, it is evident that the movie accurately portrayed the trials in 1692 on numerous occasions. Hence, while there are notable disparities, I maintain that these did not compromise the historical authenticity, and Miller successfully exercised his artistic license.
The lies and accusations in Salem during the witch trials were so extreme that they cannot be compared to life today. However, it seems that some people in modern times have not learned from the past. While not as severe as the hangings and false accusations in Salem, the act of “breaking of charity” still destroys friendships and relationships today. For example, a jealous friend may start a nasty rumor, which may initially seem harmless. However, gossip can spread quickly, causing the person to lose friends and experience negative effects on their life. Additionally, the relationship between the victim and the rumor-starter would be damaged until the situation is resolved. Although occurrences like these today rarely lead to death or the destruction of a community, lies can have a harsh impact on relationships for many individuals.
The Salem Trials and the movie The Crucible share both similarities and differences in their portrayal of historical events. I find Miller’s use of “artistic license” justified and believe that the witch trials can be compared to contemporary situations. Valuable lessons can be learned from this extreme form of religious control, and the film and actual events present various perspectives.
