We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Assignment Case Study

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Regulation Introduction to Case In New London Ct, the town was going through a hardship and the unemployment rate was doubled then the normal for that state. This prompted the government to look at redeveloping an area for some new hotel and stores and even a research facility. This new development would also include some private residents. While most of the owners sold to the city some refused to sell and took it to court in protest stating that the city was violating the taking clause.

The court found no evidence that the city was violating the taking clause.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Assignment Case Study
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

Beauty, 2008) The Taking Clause The taking clause in in place to allow some government agencies to take private property if the owner refuses to sell when this property will be used for the public. Whether this is for a new government building or the expansion of a road. One thing about this takings clause is that the government must compensate the owner for any of the property it takes.

So if the government only need to take possession of half the property then they have the option of selling the whole property to the government or the government can compensate them for half of he property.

This measure cannot be used if the government is planning on the property being used solely for private use, this would be a violation. My Opinion My opinion in this case is that the city did not violate the takings clause, the city tried to first purchase the property and these few refused causing them to act on the clause. The property they are taking possession of will be converted in to public building and will get the town up and booming again. On top of the owners getting compensated for their property they will have a chance at helping he city recover instead of watching the city go to ruins.

The way I see it yes the property may have been in the family for years, but what good is the property going to be when there is no city left. If the city fails, like it was on the path to doing, then the property would have been worth much less. Yes the city is trying to get the economics to increase and save the city, to do that they needed the means to get the economy of the city the boost. References Beauty, J and Samuelsson, S. (2008), Coinage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law. (4th De).

Cite this Assignment Case Study

Assignment Case Study. (2018, May 03). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/assignment-case-study/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page