Charlemagne Research Paper Franklin S GibbsProfHistory

Table of Content

Charlemagne Essay, Research Paper

Franklin S. Gibbs

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront


History of Western Civilization

November 25, 2000


The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker the Stammerer are really different histories of the life of the great Emperor. Einhard gives us a historical overview of the life of Charlemagne who lived from 742 to 814 A.D. Charlemagne was besides known as Charles the Great and the King of the Franks.Charles was one of four kids born to Pepin the Short, A Mayor of the Palace of the Carolingian Empire. He had one brother, Carloman and two sisters, Gisela and Pepin.Since adult females at the clip didn’t inherit power, when Pepin the Short died, the kingship of the Carolingian Empire was divided and shared by Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman. Unfortunately, Carloman died early and out of the blue as a immature adult male and the full land of the Franks was given to Charlemagne. This land was huge and covers what would today include parts of the states of Germany, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland and France.

Charlemagne took really good attention of his female parent who lived with him at the castle and died at a mature old age. His brother Pepin died as a kid and his sister Gisela spent her full life as a spiritual in a nunnery. Charlemagne had four married womans and four courtesans. From these relationships he had 14 kids. He insisted on educating all of his kids both the male childs and the misss. The male childs leaned how to run and utilize weaponries while the misss learned womanly things like weaving. Charlemagne was a devoted male parent and when he wasn’t contending a war and was at place, he insisted on eating dinner with his kids and besides took them with him on many of his journeys. He was so affiliated to his girls that he refused to give them off in matrimony with the consequence that two of them ended up holding illicit kids.

Charlemagne was a celebrated male monarch because of the many old ages in which he waged war against other states, about 40 seven old ages in entire. During that clip he practically doubled the land given to him by his male parent. He successfully waged war against many including the Bretons, Bavaria, the Slavs, Esthonians, Danes and an particularly long thirty-year war against the Saxons. He was a respected and feared by many of the swayers of other lands.

He is besides remembered because of the Carolingian Renaissance which took topographic point under his way and leading. Although he was non a erudite adult male, he revered and respected cognition. He attracted many bookmans to his castle. Theology and the literary

Skills became a portion of the mundane life in the castle for Lords and common people of endowment as good. Many constructing undertakings were besides undertaken during this clip of Renaissance including two brilliant castles the cathedral of the church of the Holy Mother of God at Aachen, the span over the Rhine at Mainz, the Restoration of many sacred edifices which had fallen into disrepair, and the edifice of a naval and coastguard fleet to protect the ports and oral cavities of rivers from enemy onslaught.

Charlemagne died at the age of 72 and designed his lone lasting boy Lewis as inheritor to his kingship. He was interred at his darling cathedral in 814 A.D. In his will, he provided for the church, the metropoliss in the land, all of his kids, grandchildren, castle workers, retainers and the hapless.

Einhard’s historical position outlined above gives a historical position of the life of Charlemagne. It was written from the historical facts every bit good as Einhard’s personal observations and his relationship with Charlemagne. Einhard was a curate of his Royal Majesty. He was extremely respected for his cognition, mind, glare, unity and character. He enjoyed a comfy life at the castle and a personal relationship with the King and his household.

His declared ground for composing the book was to do certain that the illustriousness of Charlemagne was recorded for history and to accurately record events he witnessed and could verify. He besides stated that no 1 had started to compose approximately Charlemagne to his cognition and he wanted to do certain his illustriousness was recorded. He besides felt a sense of liability for his frequenter’s attention, fostering and comfy life style he enjoyed at the castle.

Whereas Einhard wrote his book from the historical position and his personal cognition of the Emperor, Notker the Stammerer wrote his book 70 old ages after he decease of Charlemagne in the signifier of a series of anecdotes about Charlemagne’s attention of the church chiefly from the narratives told to him as a kid by a priest named Werinbert. Adalbert, who was Werinbert’s male parent was he beginning of the narratives about Charlemagne’runs of war against other states. These anecdotes in some instances support and elaborate on the basic information provided by Einhard. In other instances, the anecdotes embellish with phantasy and fiction so that small credibleness can be given to his histories.

Although it is hard to compare these two books because they are non at all similar, some comparings can be made. Einhard said that Charlemagne’s first married woman was the girl of Desiderius, the King of the Longobards. He states that that he dismissed his married woman after a twelvemonth and cipher new why he had done that. In Notker’s book, he explains that Chrlemagne had merely defeated the Longobards and in order to maintain them from splintering from the Franks, he married the girl of the King. Because she subsequently became ill, was bedridden and couldn’Ts have any kids, she was treated like she was already dead and Charlemagne picked another married woman, Hildegarde.

In Einhard’s history of the war with the Longobards, he states that the war had been begun at the petition of Hadrian, the bishop of Rome and besides had been ab initio started by Charlemagne’s male parent, Pepin the Short. He states that Charlemagne fought the war with more energy than his male parent and that after a long besieging forced the resignation of Desiderius. Charlemagne besides sent his boy, Adlagis into expatriate, restored all that had been taken from the Romans back to them, and made his so

n Pepin, King of the whole of Italy which he had conquered in this war.

In Notker’s history, one time Pepin the Short was dead, the Longobards began to hassle the Romans. Charlemagne so marched into Italy and without a conflict or any bloodshed intimidated the Longobards into give uping to him.

After the run at Longobard, Einhard states that Charlemagne put down a rebellion of the Duke of Fruili yet Notker references merely that Charlemagne visited a deceasing bishop in the metropolis of Fruili. In the war with the Avars or Huns, Einhard and Notker support each other in the sum of clip in took for Charlemagne to wholly pulverize the Huns and the grade to which the desolation was complete. Both stressed the sum of gold, Ag and cherished loot taken from the Huns during their ain runs against other states. Notker elaborated on the rings or barriers, which the Huns had erected to protect them against enemies, but it wasn’t adequate to halt Charlemagne.

In another disagreement between the two lives of Charlemagne, Einhard tells of a King Godefrid who planned to occupy the castle itself but was killed by one of his followings before he could move. Notker on the other manus provinces that King Godefrid invaded and settled in the Frankish land of Moselle. His decease, harmonizing to Notker, was at the custodies of his ain boy who killed him because he had merely repudiated his female parent and was about to get married another adult female.

Charlemagne was on the best of footings with Harun-al-Rachid, the King of the Persians and was the receiver of luxuriant gifts from the Orient. Notker tells a narrative that Charlemagne wouldn’t see the minister plenipotentiaries from the Persians for a long clip but did finally have them and handle them good. He states that the envoys brought monkeys, balsam, nard, and ointments and medicines.

Einhard describes the many outstanding undertakings built by Charlemagne including the singular building of the church of the Holy Mother of God at Aachen and the span over the Rhine River which was five 100 pess long. He besides reported that Charlemagne built a fleet to guard off onslaughts of the Scandinavians who were assailing the seashore of Gaul and Germany. Notker tells an anecdotal narrative about a peculiar archimandrite who Charlemagne had placed in charge of oversing the edifice of the cathedral and who through fraud and deceit stole from the emperor but who was later killed.

Einhard interpreted this to intend that God was watching over the personal businesss of a merely Emperor, Charlemagne. The span at Mainz caught fire by accident harmonizing to Einhard but Notker believed that the Acts of the Apostless of a few evil people caused the devastation of the span. Harmonizing to Notker, upon hearing that the Northmen had attacked a town in Southern Gaul. When Charlemagne’s work forces went to assail the ships they didn’t make them because the Northmen, upon hearing that Charlemagne was nearing fled.

Einhard describes a confederacy in which one of Charlemagne’s boy, Pepin the Hunchback planned to take over the kingship. When the secret plan was uncovered, he was punished and permitted to prosecute the life of a spiritual at the monastery at Prum. Notker reports that Pepin was sent to the poorest and most severe monastery of Saint Gall.

Einhard and Notker shared sentiments on some of the points of frock for the Emperor I that linen shirts and shortss were worn and a adventitia of white harmonizing to Einhard and white or bluish harmonizing to Notker. Places with long sets or fabric or boots with long lacings were countries of dissension. Elaborate frock was used for particular occasions harmonizing to both authors and both agreed that the Kings eating wonts were moderate and he was ever sober. Both writers besides credited Charlemagne with the Renaissance in that he welcomed bookmans to the castle and he studied many of the broad humanistic disciplines and other topics but ne’er advanced excessively far.

Harmonizing to Einhard, Charlemagne was a devout Christian who worshipped on a regular basis and went through great strivings to acquire the finest of stuffs for the edifice of the cathedral. Notker commented on the long flowing robes which the Emperor wore to flush services and did advert his attending at forenoon anthem. He besides stressed the importance Charlemagne put on holding all the churches chant the same manner and his attempts to unite the beat of intonation.

Charlemagne was a generous adult male who gave non merely to hapless people in his state but to hapless Christians all around the universe. Notker relates how Charlemagne instructed the Lords who supervised the cathedral workingmans to take attention of the workingmans and do certain they had anything they needed to be comfy.

Einhard’s Charlemagne visited Rome because Pope Leo had been attacked and blinded and the people of Rome cut out his lingua. He doesn’Ts say why this happened. The Emperor wanted to reconstruct the church, which was in a bad province. During his stay in Rome, Pope Leo proclaimed him Emperor and Augustus. He reluctantly accepted the rubric and get the better of the ill will of the other Roman Emperors by the force and strength of his personality.

In Notker’s version of these events, the Pope was the mark of a secret plan by covetous Romans who attempted to set out the eyes of the Catholic Pope but who lost bosom at the last minute and succeeded merely in cut downing him across the eyes. The Catholic Pope summoned Charlemagne to Rome and bestowed the Crown of Emperor and Augustus upon him. The

Pope’s aggressors fled when they heard that Charlemagne was coming but they were found and punished some were imprisoned and other condemned to decease.

The Charlemagne of Einhard is a adult male of many noteworthy features and achievements. Einhard gives a sense of what the of import events and people in Charlemagne’s life were. Einhard gives a more elaborate and colourful background to many of the events even if some of his descriptions and narratives are non credible.

In Einhard, we learn the facts. In Notker, we see Charlemagne’s sense of wit, and his compassion; his forgiveness; his sense of equality and equity. In the many anecdotes

Of Notker, Charlemagne comes alive.

Cite this page

Charlemagne Research Paper Franklin S GibbsProfHistory. (2018, Jun 10). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront