Children Of Alcoholics Essay, Research Paper
Children of Alcoholics Children of Alcoholics. How do they get by with their parent s job? Howdoes a kid populating with an alcoholic consequence the result and personality of the kid? Is ita positive or negative consequence? Is there an consequence at all? It is thought that being a kid ofan alcoholic consequences in a low satisfaction of life and possible minor psychiatric symptoms. Nevertheless, surveies show that this is non needfully the instance. In world, things such asperception of household, whether positive or negative, are what consequence a kid s overall viewand degree of satisfaction of life. However, alcohol addiction plays an of import function in thepossibility of doing household jobs and in bend set uping the kid s perceptual experience. Thecoping schemes or survival functions that the kids develop to cover with their alcoholicparent, and other household relationship variables, besides consequence their future mentality on life. Along with alcohol addiction comes many variables that consequence the ultimate consequence of thesituation. It is these assorted variables that lead to different effects of alcohol addiction apathetic state of affairss. Family features have featured significantly in other histories of why somechildren are more resilient than others ( paragraph 4 ) . Bing able to get by with theparent s alcohol addiction has been linked to a positive perceptual experience of the household. There arethree household variables that consequence the relationship of a household. These are household coherence, parent -child familiarity, and slowness. Family coherence refers to the togetherness of the household. It is in these kinds of state of affairss that kids describe holding more merriment withthe household and besides these households tend to hold less struggle. Parent-child familiarity dealswith how frequently a kid feels near to one or both of the parents and how frequently the kid iscomforted by them. Deliberateness trades with consistence and systematically makingplans to make things and puting ends together and the sum in which these programs arefollowed through. Negative household variables predict low life satisfaction and potentialminor psychiatric jobs better than does being a kid of an alky. Still, alcohol addiction besides increases possibilities of negative household variables. Children of alkies frequently develop get bying mechanisms to cover with theproblem. These get bying schemes may be an change of behaviour. Both Black ( 1979 ) and Wegscheider ( 1976 ) approach the alcoholic household as a system in which the familymembers are endeavoring to suit the imbibing parent and reconstruct balance throughmodifying their ain behaviour ( paragraph 6 ) . There are a five different types of behaviorsthat consequence from this. They are the responsible kid, the lost kid, the acting-out kid, the placetor and the mascot. The responsible kid takes on the function of an grownup. They tryto be the ideal kid and they feel responsible for the alcoholic. These kids tend to bemore responsible and are perfectionists. On the other manus, the lost kid contrastinglydetaches himself from the household every bit good as others in general. They tend to disregard theproblem at place. The acting-out kid turns to delinquency and engages in defiantbehaviors. The placetor normally takes on the function of the understanding go-between. Theyare more accepting and caring. The mascot uses wit as a agency to get by with thesituation. Both the placetor and the mascot use their header methods to diminish thetension that may be caused by the alcoholic parent. Whether these get bying mechanisms are or are non damaging to the overallwell-being of the kid is debatable. Some research workers say that these schemes arenegative in the long tally. Others say that they can be positive. Specifically the function of theresponsible kid and the function of the function of the placetor. These sorts of behaviours arefound in cohesive households. A survey was conducted in order to understand the effects of household variables andcoping functions on kids of alkies. The survey had three major ends. The first is toexplain the part of parental imbibing and household relationship variables tochildren s wellbeing in footings of important or non-significant chief effects. The secondgoal is to place which, if any, of the household variables protect kids from alcoholichomes ; that is trial for interactions between parental usage and the household variables. Third, to research the extent that the endurance roles lessen the likeliness of minor psychiatricsymptoms and low satisfaction in a baleful place environment ( paragraph 10 ) . Thestudy had a entire sample of 112 participants with a average age of 16.62. Certainapproaches were taken in the trying methodological analysis in order to restrict or extinguish prejudices.
The experiment included a questionnai
re. The first part was a Children ofAlcoholics Screening Test (CAST) (Jones, 1982; Pilat & Jones, 1985) which determinedwhether or not the subject had an alcoholic parent. The next part of the test measuredfamily cohesiveness, family deliberateness and parent-child intimacy. The third part ofthe experiment tested for the survival role most attributable to the subject. Next aGeneral Health Questionnaire was given to determine the general mental well-being andlevel of life satisfaction among the subjects. Lastly, the experiment looked forinformation on things such as age, sex, and student and employment status. The study came up with many conclusions that were statistically significant. Firstof all, parental drinking and family support are negatively correlated. This proves thatthough just being a child of an alcoholic may not necessarily cause minor psychiatricsymptoms and low life satisfaction, it does cause low family relationship variables whichdo cause the symptoms and lack of satisfaction. The study also shows that alcoholicfamilies with family support had children with higher levels of life satisfaction thanchildren of alcoholics without family support. This shows that lack of family support isthe factor that is detrimental to mental health. The effects that alcoholism has on generalmental health appears to work through the family variables, with low family supportbeing associated with high minor psychiatric symptoms (paragraph 25). Thisfurthermore illustrates the point that alcoholism is an additional factor that combinedwith low family support causes negative life consequences rather than just alcoholismbeing the sole cause. The study also found that the five survival roles did not benefit thechildren of alcoholics. In fact, three of the five roles, the mascot, the lost child and theacting-out child had negative effects and these were associated with psychiatricsymptoms. The remaining two roles, the responsible child and the placater did not effectthe overall situation in children of alcoholics. The objective of this study was to determine the existence of a connectionbetween minor psychiatry symptoms and low life satisfaction and children of alcoholics. What can be drawn is that being a child of an alcoholic does not cause low lifesatisfaction. An unsupportive family is a more probable cause to this. Nonetheless,there is a correlation between alcoholism and low family support. Alcoholism addsstressors to family situations and this makes it likely to be both a child of an alcoholicand have low family support. Therefore, being a child of an alcoholic makes yoususceptible to psychiatry symptoms. What causes some children of alcoholics to be able to avoid any psychiatryproblems and achieve a high satisfaction of life deals with their perception of theproblem. A way in which this can be done is in a cohesive family. In this family, theparents shield the child from the reality of the drinking problem. The child is not madeaware that the parent has a problem in one way or another, such as keeping the childaway in times which the problem would be apparent. Another way is to offer the childemotional support. These tactics all relate to family variables though. They require acloseness in the family (family cohesiveness), and comfort and emotional support from atleast one if the parents (parent-child intimacy). Being a child of an alcoholic is believed to be a direct cause of low lifesatisfaction and a cause of minor psychiatry symptoms. Yet there are those which arechildren of alcoholics that are not harmed in these ways by this experience. This is dueto other variables such as family relationship variables. If these variables are positivethan the chance of having low life satisfaction and/or minor psychiatry symptoms are lowwhether you are a child of an alcoholic or not. Another determining factor is the possibleformation of survival roles. If formed, the roles of the responsible child and the placaterchild have no effect on life satisfaction level or psychiatry symptoms. But the three otherroles, mascot, lost child and acting-out do cause minor psychiatry problems. It is thesefactors that negatively effect children. They do not only happen in cases of children ofalcoholics but alcoholic situations are a potential cause of these circumstances. All ofthese variables ultimately just effect the child s perception of the situation. It is thisperception that is responded to and this perception that effects behavior of the children ofalcoholics. Work Cited Braithwaite, Valerie, and Devine, Cindy (1993). Life Satisfaction and Adjustment of Children of Alcoholics: The Effects of Parental Drinking, Family Disorganization, and Survival Roles. British Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 32, 417