Discussion
This tremendous canvas is a close-up of the creative person himself, Chuck Close. With head place somewhat looking up, this facial picture fills the canvas, with utmost item. You can see all facial characteristics as you would see Chuck Close in existent life. The hair, for-head, eyes, bone-mass, nose, lips, mentum, and facial hair are seen in astonishing item. Furthermore, he includes his vintage spectacless and a combustion coffin nail in his oral cavity, maintaining all elements in perfect proportion.
The face takes up the whole canvas. The coppice shots are refined and detailed along with natural tegument tones as colour. Shadowing and high spots give the consequence that you re looking at a exposure. The pigment is applied really easy in little countries, utilizing really thin lines. I had to about set my olfactory organ to the canvas to see any grounds of paint.
Analysis
Detail of brushstrokes and colour value create a sense of world in this piece. The punctilious utilizations of brushstrokes are consistent in Chuck Close s self-portrait. The work is highly representational ; at first glimpse you see an hypertrophied exposure. The proportion of the facial characteristics is perfect. Not a furrow or hair was left out
. Merely seeing the face on such a big canvas, with all the item, calls for little repeated brushstrokes and shadowing. The colourss, contouring every bone and musculus, are smooth and gradual. The tegument is surprisingly realistic and looks bushy. What catches my attending most are the contemplations used in the work. On such things as the spectacless and eyes, you can see the fluorescent lighting in the studio. These values are repeated to give dimension and real-ness. Furthermore, the lines of the facial hair can be seen about coming from the teguments pours. Decidedly, repeat of item gives this piece its concluding consequence.
Interpretation
I see honesty and world in this work of art. Not through the creative persons look or imaginativeness, but through item. Nothing is left out ; everything is unfastened for us to see. I feel a sense of modestness as good. The creative person has portrayed such item that most of us would detest for everyone to see. But Chuck Close is puting it on the tabular array for us, beautiful or non.
I see an honest self-image seen through: shaggy, unshaven face, mussy hair, dirty tegument, the birth of his spectacless, and even a combustion coffin nail held between his lips. But in this are beauty, and the normalcy of life that we all portion. Why attempt to conceal what is at that place? Obviously, Chuck Close doesn T attention for such nonmeaningful concerns.
