Primary education provides essential life skills, making school beyond year 6 unnecessary. High school builds upon these foundational skills and is only necessary for those pursuing higher education.
The government’s authority in determining the necessity of high school attendance should be relinquished, allowing individuals who have finished primary education and possess decision-making capabilities to make this choice. High school frequently accommodates disinterested students who cause disruptions and obstruct the learning environment for those who genuinely appreciate the curriculum.
If school were not mandatory, these students would have the freedom to choose whether they want to attend classes or enter the workforce. This would prevent them from disrupting the class and negatively impacting other students’ chances of learning. Additionally, it would allow them to start their careers earlier, gain valuable experience, and enhance their prospects for obtaining positions of responsibility. If attending school was optional, it would be advantageous for both enthusiastic learners and those who prefer joining the workforce. High schools offer education that may not be necessary for everyone. Once students complete primary school, they have already acquired fundamental skills required for unskilled professions and do not necessarily need the more advanced education provided by high schools.
Sons or daughters often continue the family business, and after finishing their primary education, additional and more advanced education is not required since they can acquire all the necessary knowledge about their future profession from their parents. I think that secondary education should be optional for individuals. It is unjust to compel all young individuals, sometimes unnecessarily, to attend school when the decision to enter the workforce should be up to the student. Just because some students wish to complete their secondary education does not mean that every student does, and it is unfair to assume otherwise.
