Social Network and Its Effect on Poor Students Academic Performance

Table of Content

Facebook. Twitter. and Instagram are the illustration celebrated societal web that becomes the best pick among the pupils. particularly university pupils. Social web can specify as site of grouping of persons into specific groups. like little rural communities or a neighbourhood subdivision. Nowadays. the societal web is a necessary communicating tool that has emerged in the field of information and communicating engineering and has positively impacted about all facets of human life ( Audrey. Gerald. Tai. 2012 as cited in CBSNews. 2008 ) . Apart from that. dependence of utilizing societal web can go negative effects overweight the positive 1s. These sites have caused some possible injury to society. The pupils become victims of societal webs more frequently than anyone else ( Michael. 2012 ) . First. one of the effects of dependence societal web is it may take pupils to blowing their free clip. The ground of this state of affairs happen is pupils may surf more societal web for playing on-line games compare to utilize their free clip for survey. ‘Farmville’ and ‘I am Player’ are the illustration online games that are in swerving in Facebook. The CBS News National letter writer. Hattie Kauffman reported that people who use the Internet overly. defined as utilizing for more than 30 or 40 hours a hebdomad the Internet to take part in SNSs. look into electronic mails and play on-line computing machine games are considered Internet nuts ( CBS News. 2008 ) . Other cause is that they considered stalking other people’s profile history for hours on terminal ( Walker. n. d. ) . Stalking on other people’s profile history can do pupils while off to make a alteration their lesson. Students. while seeking and analyzing online. acquire attracted to utilizing societal media sites and sometimes they forget why they are utilizing cyberspace. This wastes their clip and sometimes pupils are non able to present their work in the specified clip frame ( Negative Effectss of Social Networking Sites for Students. 2012 ) . In add-on. chew the fating activity during free clip besides can give a negative impact to student’s public presentation. Some instructors believe that despite schools censoring nomadic phones. many students take smart phones in secret to school and remain affiliated to societal networking web sites in category ( Bloxham. 2010 ) .

Besides that. pupils can cut down acquisition and research capablenesssamong pupils. One of the causes this happen is by did their assignment at last proceedingss. This is because they trusting more on the information accessible easy on the societal networking sites and the web ( Negative Effectss of Social Networking Sites for Students. 2012 ) . Scope of research besides is non extended because it merely merely based on societal web particularly in web log. Furthermore. all the information obtained likely untrue or bogus. Sometimes. information was given by anon. normally non true because the beginning that they got is bogus. In add-on. pupils who spend much of their clip online happen it harder to concentrate in category. are for good distracted and have shorter attending spans. research workers found ( Bloxham. 2010 ) .

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Addiction of utilizing societal web besides reduces bid over linguistic communication usage age and originative authorship accomplishments ( Negative Effectss of Social Networking Sites for Students. 2012 ) . Student linguistic communication will be mishmash linguistic communication when they started to utilize societal web in their day-to-day yearss. This is because pupils ever use slang words or shortened signifiers of words on societal networking sites. They start trusting on the computing machine grammar and spelling cheque characteristics. This can cut down their bid over the linguistic communication and their originative authorship accomplishments. Other than that. pupils besides did non expose to current issues ( Bloxham. 2010 ) . This is because they merely merely play with societal web. When they started to play societal network’ application. they might non cognize what happened to outside universe because they are really focussed on societal web. This will impact their cognition to make composing because they do non hold an thought to compose. Students besides influenced by the tendency carried in this modern coevals ( The Effects of Social Networking upon Society. n. d. ) . When pupils go to outside universe. they will confront much sort of people. Sometime. this people were followed the new tendency linguistic communication in this modern clip. So. when pupils spoke with them. pupils will act upon with their tendency. This will be job to student how to cognize that linguistic communication is true or non. If they can non to acknowledge. they will convey this linguistic communication to their authorship and can do the authorship to be false.

In decision. there are many causes that can give an impact largely is negative effects to student academic public presentation. Social networking isgoing progressively popular and is a tendency among immature grownups presents. Hence. there should be a survey to happen out whether is at that place any signifier of dependence that attracts the frequent visits and use of societal networking sites. To sum up. pupils should hold to gain that societal web is non gave 100 % a positive consequence to them for success in academic public presentation. So. as a pupil we need to step frontward believing about our hereafter and do a move to acquire success in academic. ( 744 words )

Mentions

Bloxham. A. ( 2010. November 18 ) . Social networking: instructors blame Facebook and Twitter for pupils’ hapless classs. The Telegraph. Retrieved July 10. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. telegraph. co. uk/education/educationnews/8142721/Social-networking-teachers-blame-Facebook-and-Twitter-for-pupils-poor-grades. hypertext markup language

CBSNews. ( 2008 ) . Social networking: An Internet dependence. The CBS News. Retrieved July 11. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. cbsnews. com/stories/2008/06/24/earlyshow/main4205009. shtml? tag=contentMain ; contentBody Negative Effectss of Social Networking Sites for Students. ( 2012 ) . Retrieved July 10. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //performancing. com/negative-effects-of-social-networking-sites-for-students/

P. C. C. Audrey. G. G. G. Gerald. S. C. Thai ( 2012 ) . Online Social Networking Addiction among University Students in Malaysia. International Journal on Social Science Economics & A ; Art. 2 ( 21-27 ) . Retrieved July 15. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. insightsociety. org/ojssea/index. php/ijssea/article/download/108/94 The Effectss of Social Networking upon Society. ( n. d. ) . Retrieved July 10. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //teenink. com/nonfiction/academic/article/485925/The-Effects-of-Social-Networking-upon-Society/

Walker. L. ( n. d. ) . What Is Social Networking Addiction? Retrieved July 11. 2013

Cite this page

Social Network and Its Effect on Poor Students Academic Performance. (2017, Jul 16). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/social-network-and-its-effect-on-poor-students-academic-performance-essay/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront