We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

See Pricing

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and See Pricing

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

Standardization Of The English Language Research

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

Deadline:2 days left
"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

Standardization Of The English Language Essay, Research Paper

Standardization of the English Language

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Standardization Of The English Language Research
Just from $13,9/Page
Get custom paper

There are several of import events before 1500 that when listed together show a

series of stairss in the battle for English linguistic communication domination. These stairss are

chiefly governmental, legal and official events that pushed English use. In

1356 The Sheriff & # 8217 ; s Court in London and Middlesex were conducted in English for

the first clip. When Parliament opened in 1362 the Statute of Pleading was

issued declaring English as a linguistic communication of the tribunals every bit good as of Parliament,

but it was non until 1413 that English became the official linguistic communication of the

tribunals everyplace. Thirteen old ages subsequently in 1423, Parliament records start being

written in English.

1400 Markss day of the month that English is used in composing volitions, a

apparently little measure, but one that impacted many people and began a bequest of

record maintaining in English. In 1450 English became the linguistic communication used in? composing

town Torahs and eventually 1489 saw all legislative acts written in English. But it was non

until 1649 that English became the linguistic communication of legal paperss in topographic point of Latin.

The formal regulations intended to maintain the usage of French in official capacities were

non plenty to battle the effects of the Black Death and the Hundred Years War

between France and England, which both contributed greatly to the rise of

English and autumn of French. By the 14th century, English was once more known

by most people, although French was non forgotten, and the people who spoke

Gallic were by and large bilingual. The? Statute of Pleading made it jurisprudence that

English and non French would be used in the tribunals. However, it needs to be

emphasized that at the terminal of this statement, it says that after the pleadings,

arguments, etc. in English were finished, they should be entered and enrolled in

Latin. English became the official linguistic communication of the tribunal in 1413, but French was

permitted until the 18th century.

More than the official bureaucratic alterations in regulations and jurisprudence were the alterations in

the usage of the linguistic communication by the mundane talkers. The alterations that distinguish

Early Modern English from Middle English are significant. The regulations for spelling

were set down for the first clip. The key is the new consistence used by

instructors, pressmans and finally by the general public. The mark of adulthood

for English was the understanding on one set of regulations replacing the spelling free-

for-all that had existed.

Out of the assortment of? local idioms at that place emerged toward the terminal of the

14th century a written linguistic communication that in class of the 15th century

won general acknowledgment and has since become the accepted criterion in address

and composing. The portion of England that contributed most to the formation of this

criterion was the East Midland type of English that became itst footing,

peculiarly the idiom of the city, London. East Midland territory was

the largest and most thickly settled of the major idiom countries. There were besides two

universities, Oxford and Cambridge. In the 14th century the monasteries

were playing a less of import function in the spread of larning than they had one time

played, while the two universities had developed into of import rational

centres. So far as Cmbridge is concerned any ist influence was exerted in

support of the East Midland idiom. That of Oxford is less certain because

Oxfordshire was on the boundary line between Midland and Southern and its idiom

shows certain characteristic Southern characteristics.

Written London English of the stopping point of the 14th century as used by a

figure of Middle English writers, such as John Gower and Geoffrey Chaucer, had

non achived the position of a regional criterion but was shortly to go the footing

for a new national literary criterion of English. It was the linguistic communication of the

capital. Geographically, it occupied a place midway between the utmost North

and the utmost South. Already by 1430, this new criterion had assumed a

comparatively mature signifier. It was spread throughout England by professional clerks

in the administrative setup of the state and besides became the theoretical account for

concern aand pri-vate correspondence in English. It was this Chancery criterion,

the normal linguistic communication for all official written communicating by the clip when

Caxton set up his Printing Press in West-minster ( 1476 ) , which became the direct

ascendant of Modern Standard English. As a consequence of this developments, the usage

of regional idioms in composing receded more and more in the class of the?

15th century until, in the Early Modern English period, composing came to be

entirely done in the standard literary linguistic communication.

The linguistic communication of Chaucer & # 8217 ; s late 14th century and of the fifteenth were

frequently describe as Late Middle English. It could every bit good be called Early Modern

English. Ich and I ran side by side in Chaucer & # 8217 ; s linguistic communication, and the differentiation

between? ye? and? you was still that of nomina-tive versus objective case. Northern

they had replaced the earlier Anglo-Saxon hie, but hem was still alive. Such

became the preferable Chancery signifier which had ousted sich, sych, seche and swiche.

Which was replacing wich. The subsidiary verbs appear more on a regular basis in their

modern signifiers: can, could, shall, should and would. A standardized spelling was

developing which was divorced from the phonic environment so that sound and

spelling were going two separete systems.

An of import lingual alteration was besides in sentence structure. Syntax governs the construction

of a sentence every bit good a

s the construction of verbs. Auxiliary verbs came into usage,

for illustration the usage of? make and? have which extended the capableness of look

for verbs. The elusive differences between? I walk, I do walk, and? I am walking

are non available in many other linguistic communications. This betterment assisted English in

distinguishing itself from other linguistic communications. The usage of? do as a & # 8220 ; assisting & # 8221 ; verb

led the manner for a host of other assisting verbs: be, hold, can, may, will and so

Forth. This important invention set in gesture a new manner for verbs to be used.

English now uses subject-verb-object ( SVO ) , which was non ever true, nor must

it be true. Other linguistic communications use SOV and some do non necessitate a peculiar order.

These linguistic communications use words such as atoms, instance terminations or accent for order

choice standards. In the twelvemonth 1000, the beginning of the Middle English period,

the direct object appeared before the verb in? 52 % of the sentences. By 1500, it

appeared before the verb in merely 2 % of the sentences. The biggest alteration was

between 1300 ( 40 % ) and 1400 ( 14 % ) . The consequence is that today we use the sentence

order established at that time. ? The of import point was the constitution of

the convention of word order that helped to construction the linguistic communication for general

usage. The important alteration in English sentences was the degree of complexness

with new constructions to back up it. Science did non so much create the complexness,

but instead used the available capableness.

The alterations in grammar during the early modern period were more far making the

illustrations given. In fact, they were so far making that the grammar of English

has changed really small since so. What alterations have happened have been little,

gradual and non important. The English linguistic communication experienced a major turbulence

in grammar followed by a stableness for many centuries. The alterations were

cardinal and powerful plenty to prolong enormous alteration in scientific discipline,

literature, engineering and all other aspects of human being. Besides grammar,

an unusual alteration in the 1300s occurred called the Great Vowel Shift. For no

obvious ground the pronunciation of most vowels changed. There is a clear

form of how they shifted, but non why. There is besides no clear benefit to the

linguistic communication, merely that it was portion of the overall, dramatic metabolism of

English. Every known facet of the linguistic communication experienced alteration and growing.

The Great Vowel Shift had besides cosiderably increased the disagreements between

spelling and proununciation. Therefore were the & # 8220 ; spelling-reformers & # 8221 ; foremost to

look on the scene, get downing with a book in Latin by Sir Thomas Smith,

entitled: De recta et emendata Linguae Anglicanae Scriptione ( 1568 ) . Soon

followed on the same topic by John Hart An Orthographie ( 1569 ) , William

Bullokar and Richard Mulcaster & # 8217 ; s book The right authorship of our English Aleurites fordii

( 1582 ) , Simon Daines Orthoepia Anglicana ( 1640 ) . However, none of these achived

anything like the stabilising consequence on writing system which finally proceeded

from Samuel Johnson & # 8217 ; s Dictionary of the English Language ( 1755 ) whose spelling

has become the & # 8216 ; normal & # 8217 ; spelling of? Present-Day British Standard English.

The orthographical reformists of the 17th century were shortly joined by

syntacticians. Aims at & # 8216 ; regulating grammar & # 8217 ; became more and more marked in

the latter portion of the 17th century and completly dominated grammatical

thought in the century to follow, and non & # 8216 ; grammatical thought & # 8217 ; in the narrow

sense merely. The puting down of regulations about acceptable use was now, and

particularly in the latter half of the 18th century, extended to all

constituents of Standard English.

In the latter portion of the 15th century the London criterion had been

accepted in most parts of the state. By the center of the century a reasonably

cosistent assortment of written English in both spelling and grammar had developed.

With the introdution of? printing in 1476 a new influence of great importance in

the spread of London English came into drama. From the get downing London has been

the Centre of book publication in England. Caxton the first English pressman, used

the current address of London in his legion interlingual renditions, and the books the

issued from his imperativeness and from the imperativenesss of his replacements gave a currency to

London English that assured more than anything else its rapid acceptance. In the

16th century the usage of London English had become a affair of principle as

good as pattern.

From the clip of Caxton on, English is non simply a series of related unwritten

idioms, which are occasionaly written. It is a to the full developed cultural lingua,

the equal, in its ain manner, of the Latin and Greek of Classical antiquity. It

is a linguistic communication with a legion organic structure of incorporate talkers and authors, a linguistic communication

with a huge possible and existent market. The modern English that emerges from

the epoch of Chaucer and Caxton is a lingua that still possesses huge

possibilities of alteration, channeled in the way of vocabulary instead than of

sounds or grammatical construction.


1. Baugh, A. and Cable Thomas, A History of the English Language ( London, 1978


2. Berndt, Rolf, History of the English Language ( Leipzig, 1982 )

3. Blake, Norman, The Cambridge History of the English Language ( Cambridge,

1992 )

4. Burnley, David, The Language of Chaucer ( London, 1989 )

5. Pei, Mario, The Story of the English Language ( New York, 1967 )

6. Strang, Barbara, A History of English ( London, 1970 )

Cite this Standardization Of The English Language Research

Standardization Of The English Language Research. (2017, Jul 19). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/standardization-of-the-english-language-essay-research/

Show less
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Search for essay samples now

Haven't found the Essay You Want?

Get my paper now

For Only $13.90/page