Appearances Can Be Deceiving, Assignment

Table of Content

David Buckram’s $mom claim for libel and slander rejected by US judge In this case with David Buckram’s $mom claim for libel and slander of a celebrity magazine that alleged he slept with a prostitute, Irma Nice age 26. US judge rejected his claim, the libel laws in the US are more favorable to defendants. In this case, public figures where they attempt to bring a libel action in the US must be proved “actual malice”.

The judge states that David Beckman is a public Geiger and his lawgivers did not succeed to produce enough evidence that In Touch acted with malice. In addition, of infidelity by Beckman would be of interest to the public. Buckram’s lawyer said David was visiting his sick father in England at the time. Kendall asked the judge to allow the case to proceed but refused. The lawyer of In Touches owner, Elizabeth Manager insisted that the company did everything possible to corroborate details from Ionic’s interview and Manager toll the court that Nice was “entirely consistent with Mr..

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Buckram’s reputation as a serial philanderer”. The company and lawyer Elizabeth were pleased that the court followed the law and did the correct thing. Beckman said the claims were completely false and that caused distress in his family along with never even meeting the woman named Nice nor ever paid to have an affair with her. Bauer argued that In Touch merely reported where it is believed to be true. Buckram’s publicist Jeff Raymond said the company have not provided not a piece of evidence to support the claim is vividly true.

Beckman and his lawyers have already won a court ruling in Germany and are awaiting damages. Unfortunately, the US legal system requires us to show that the magazine acted maliciously. Any knowledgeable person knows this story not to be true, and we will continue to fight this in court and the decision will be appealed” I think that David Beckman shouldn’t have to worry about what the media is stating about him. Seriously, we live in a world where the media is often exaggerating about anything to make profit out of it.

The media is being bribed by other people with large amounts of money that want to mess up someone else’s reputation. Also, claiming $mom for to the US judge? Really? The judge isn’t going to waists his/her time to a celebrity claiming what a celebrity magazine writes about them. I say grow up David, and not to waists tax payers money for a stupid claim and go to another country who actually cares. I find that actually ridiculous, I am glad the judge refused this case.

Cite this page

Appearances Can Be Deceiving, Assignment. (2018, May 15). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront