Get help now

Appearances Can Be Deceiving, Assignment

  • Pages 2
  • Words 444
  • Views 701
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    David Buckram’s $mom claim for libel and slander rejected by US judge In this case with David Buckram’s $mom claim for libel and slander of a celebrity magazine that alleged he slept with a prostitute, Irma Nice age 26. US judge rejected his claim, the libel laws in the US are more favorable to defendants. In this case, public figures where they attempt to bring a libel action in the US must be proved “actual malice”.

    The judge states that David Beckman is a public Geiger and his lawgivers did not succeed to produce enough evidence that In Touch acted with malice. In addition, of infidelity by Beckman would be of interest to the public. Buckram’s lawyer said David was visiting his sick father in England at the time. Kendall asked the judge to allow the case to proceed but refused. The lawyer of In Touches owner, Elizabeth Manager insisted that the company did everything possible to corroborate details from Ionic’s interview and Manager toll the court that Nice was “entirely consistent with Mr..

    Buckram’s reputation as a serial philanderer”. The company and lawyer Elizabeth were pleased that the court followed the law and did the correct thing. Beckman said the claims were completely false and that caused distress in his family along with never even meeting the woman named Nice nor ever paid to have an affair with her. Bauer argued that In Touch merely reported where it is believed to be true. Buckram’s publicist Jeff Raymond said the company have not provided not a piece of evidence to support the claim is vividly true.

    Beckman and his lawyers have already won a court ruling in Germany and are awaiting damages. Unfortunately, the US legal system requires us to show that the magazine acted maliciously. Any knowledgeable person knows this story not to be true, and we will continue to fight this in court and the decision will be appealed” I think that David Beckman shouldn’t have to worry about what the media is stating about him. Seriously, we live in a world where the media is often exaggerating about anything to make profit out of it.

    The media is being bribed by other people with large amounts of money that want to mess up someone else’s reputation. Also, claiming $mom for to the US judge? Really? The judge isn’t going to waists his/her time to a celebrity claiming what a celebrity magazine writes about them. I say grow up David, and not to waists tax payers money for a stupid claim and go to another country who actually cares. I find that actually ridiculous, I am glad the judge refused this case.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Appearances Can Be Deceiving, Assignment. (2018, May 15). Retrieved from

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy