Figaro premiered at the Burgtheater in Vienna on 1 May 1786, the cast for which is included in the “Roles” section below. Mozart himself directed the first two performances, conducting seated at the keyboard, the custom of the day. Later performances were by Joseph Weigl. [6] The first production was given eight further performances, all in 1786. [7] Although the total of nine performances was nothing like the frequency of performance of Mozart’s later success The Magic Flute, which for months was performed roughly every other day,[5] the premiere is generally judged to have been a success.
The applause of the audience on the first night resulted in five numbers being encored, seven on 8 May. [8] Joseph II, who, in addition to his empire, was in charge of the Burgtheater,[9] was concerned by the length of the performance and directed his aide Count Rosenberg as follows: “To prevent the excessive duration of operas, without however prejudicing the fame often sought by opera singers from the repetition of vocal pieces, I deem the enclosed notice to the public (that no piece for more than a single voice is to be repeated) to be the most reasonable expedient. You will therefore cause some posters to this effect to be printed. [10] The requested posters were printed up and posted in the Burgtheater in time for the third performance on 24 May. [11] The newspaper Wiener Realzeitung carried a review of the opera in its issue of 11 July 1786. It alludes to interference probably produced by paid hecklers, but praises the work warmly: “Mozart’s music was generally admired by connoisseurs already at the first performance, if I except only those whose self-love and conceit will not allow them to find merit in anything not written by themselves. The public, however … did not really know on the first day where it stood.
It heard many a bravo from unbiassed connoisseurs, but obstreperous louts in the uppermost storey exerted their hired lungs with all their might to deafen singers and audience alike with their St! and Pst; and consequently opinions were divided at the end of the piece. Apart from that, it is true that the first performance was none of the best, owing to the difficulties of the composition. But now, after several performances, one would be subscribing either to the cabal or to tastelessness if one were to maintain that Herr Mozart’s music is anything but a masterpiece of art. It contains so many eauties, and such a wealth of ideas, as can be drawn only from the source of innate genius. “[12] The Hungarian poet Ferenc Kazinczy was in the audience for a May performance, and later remembered the powerful impression the work made on him: “[Nancy] Storace [see below], the beautiful singer, enchanted eye, ear, and soul. – Mozart directed the orchestra, playing his fortepiano; the joy which this music causes is so far removed from all sensuality that one cannot speak of it. Where could words be found that are worthy to describe such joy? “[13] Joseph Haydn appreciated the opera greatly, writing to a friend that he heard it in his dreams
