Get help now

Toltec Civilization Research Paper Toltec Civilization

  • Pages 17
  • Words 4132
  • Views 636
  • dovnload



  • Pages 17
  • Words 4132
  • Views 636
  • Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get your paper price

    124 experts online

    Toltec Civilization Essay, Research Paper

    Toltec Civilization

    The Priest stood atop the temple of the Sun, looking down on his people gathered

    for this event. With one Swift motion, he raised the sacrificial obsidian sticker and

    plunged it into the immature adult male ’ s chest, rupturing out his bosom. He so placed the bosom on

    the waiting chac-mool, smiled, and anounced the beginning of jubilation.

    The Toltecs were one of the first “ Nahuatl ” talking civilizations to colonise cardinal

    Mexico. It is ill-defined whether they came from the North or the South, but, popular theory

    is that they came from the North ( Southern America ) . The folk foremost settled a little

    distance West of what is now Mexico City. There, they built the largest metropolis of all time in

    Mexico, even shadowing today ’ s Mexico City ( von Hagen, Sun, pp. 20, 29 ) ! The Toltecs

    ruled over this town from 200 B.C to 900 A.D ( Sabloff, p. 112 ) . Then, something forced

    them to go forth ; clime alteration, aliens, a war, cipher knows.

    The Toltecs so migrated about 50 stat mis North. There, they settled and began to

    construct the town called Tula ( Gruzinski, p. 14 ) . They resided at that place until 1100 A.D ( Sabloff,

    p. 112 ) . In around 987 A.D or so, the Toltec priest- male monarch Quezalcoatl ( who was really a

    God. There are besides records of a adult male named Topiltzin who seemingly followed the same

    class as Quetzalcoatl. It was ill-defined who was who, or if they were the same individual. )

    was forced to fly with a few of his followings ( Gruzinski, p. 14 ) . He fled to the Yucatan

    peninsula, where the Mayas resided. He so proceeded to construct a mammoth metropolis called

    Chichen Itza ( von Hagen, Maya, p 39 ) .

    Here, we switch to Mayan history, which discusses the leading of a adult male called

    Kukulcan, which means “ feathered-serpent, ” or Quetzalcoatl ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 332 ) .

    He ruled over this civilization for some clip, so he decided to go forth. Again, there is no

    grounds stating why he left. On the twelvemonth 1-Reed ( a Toltec step of clip ) , he set canvas

    West in the Atlantic ocean, with the prophesy that he would return on the return of

    that day of the month ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 28 ) .

    Meanwhile, back in Tula, things were disintegrating in the Toltec civilization. Their

    society was going increasingly militant, as was evidenced in their art. They began

    perverting political power and going greedy for money. They raped the villagers with

    revenue enhancements utilizing the Gods as their athority ( Townsend, p. 49-50 ) . This brought about a civil

    war which thouroughly destroyed the Toltecs ( Gruzinski, p.15 ) .

    Yes, the Toltec people decidedly practiced human forfeit. Immediately, one

    thinks what the Spaniards thought when they observed the Aztecs executing the same

    ritual 600 old ages subsequently: “ Savages! ”

    In this paper, I will seek to convert you why you should non see the Toltecs

    barbarians, but see them the prototype of civilisation. If I am to turn out this to you, we

    must hold an apprehension of what the word “ civilisation ” agencies.

    There are two traits that I think are needed for a functional society. These two

    traits are be aftering, and the group over the 1. I will explicate each of these in bend, but

    foremost, I will speak about one other thought. This thought is non a trait of civilised civilizations, but is

    more of a method to look into the effectivity of the civilization ’ s patterns. Does the civilized

    people ’ s ways work for other groups of people?

    If a civilization is civilized, it would follow that another group of people, following

    that civilization ’ s ways, would go civilised themselves. I think this is an clever

    method to look into the workability of the civilisation. If the civilised people ’ s ways would

    non work for person else, it would be difficult to name them civilized.

    The Toltecs supply a rare chance to witness this in action. They touched

    about every Mexican civilisation that came after them. Subsequently in this paper, I will demo

    you two of them: the Maya and the Aztecs.

    A by-product of a civilisation is engineering. The chief intent of conveying Forth a

    civilisation is to do life better. What engineering does is do life easier. A good

    illustration of this is the wheel.

    The wheel is considered the most of import innovation in history. The ground it was

    invented, it seems, was to do the motion of big, heavier objects easier. It,

    hence, makes life easier. Technological promotions of this sort do non happen

    of course without the aid of civilised heads.

    One trait, about entirely exhibited by civilised societies, is the thought that the

    group is more of import than the 1. If one picks about any civilisation that of all time originate

    on the planet, one will see this trait. The lone topographic point that I have seen where this is non true

    is in early European monarchies.

    A twosome of Europe ’ s monarchies were wholly right ; the male monarch or queen truly cared

    about the people. But, in most that I have learned about, the sovereign cared merely for

    themselves, and deriving power. One must look at the slaughter they have waged upon

    every other civilisation on Earth, particularly in the Americas. Puting the group before the

    one is evidently a needed feature for any civilisation to last.

    As I will demo you, non merely did the Toltecs excell in engineering and stress

    the group, but they besides taught two other tribes how to go civilised.


    In Aztec, “ Toltec ” means “ builder ” ( Tomkins, p. 20 ) . This was no happenstance.

    When the Aztecs rewrote history, they attributed to the Toltecs the innovation of picture,

    literature, sculpture, uranology, and architecture ( Gruzinski, p. 14 ) . In Aztec civilization, a

    maestro craftsman of any type was called Toltec, which was the highest signifier of compliment

    ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 29 ) .

    What stands out most in Toltec engineering has to be its architecture. Their first

    major metropolis was Teotihuacan, located a twosome of stat mis east of what is now Mexico City.

    Teotihuacan was by far the greatest metropolis in all Mexico, as it is still the largest. It

    was built around 200 B.C. and occupied by Toltecs for about 1100 old ages until 900 A.D. ,

    when they were forced out by unknown forces ( Sabloff, p. 112 ) .

    The first characteristic the visitant to Teotihuacan notices is the Sun Temple, the largest

    pyramid in Mexico, even equaling Egyptian pyramids. This poses an interesting inquiry:

    are they related? The pyramid is 216 ft. high and screens about 10 estates. It was built utilizing

    a stepped-wall architecture, which is what all subsequent pyramids were based on ( von

    Hagen, Sun, p. 31 ) .

    An interesting find about this pyramid is that it appears to hold been built in

    phases. A series of 6 smaller pyramids have been found underneath the outer shell

    ( Tompkins, p. 334 ) .

    The pyramid was likely used for ceremonial intents, as is evidenced by the

    stalking figure of chac-mool. The chac-mool is a statue reclining in a semi-situp place.

    The caput, which is held upward, faces off from its tummy, where it holds a dish. On

    this dish were placed newly lacerate human Black Marias ( Sabloff, p. 112 ) .

    The temple shows an overall sense of planning. Could such a chef-d’oeuvre been

    erected by even an ground forces of crude people? Merely big graduated table planning could hold

    acomplished this, which can be seen in Teotihuacan ’ s three other big constructions: the

    Moon temple, the temple of Quetzalcoatl, and the priest-king ’ s castle ( von Hagen, Aztec,

    p. 39 ) .

    Planing on a much grander graduated table can easy be seen if looking at the metropolis as a

    whole. First, seemingly every square pes of the metropolis was paved. Alternatively of reinventing

    concrete for the Romans, though, the Toltecs used little rocks and a type of howitzer. No

    little undertaking ( Tompkins, p. 189 ) .

    Through the centre of the metropolis there is a wholly consecutive route running the

    length of the metropolis North and South. At the North terminal is the Moon Temple, and at the

    other terminal is the castle and temple of Quetzalcoatl. In the centre, confronting west, is the Sun

    Temple. They are all equally spaced ( von Hagen, Aztec, p. 39 ) .

    Even the houses of the common people show a sense of intent. They are equally

    laid out in subdivisions coming off the chief route. Each house itself was functionally laid

    out with different suites set up for different things ( Tompkins, p. 189 ) .

    The most cryptic thing about the metropolis was its devastation. The whole metropolis was

    buried under soil, even the massive Sun temple! After delving up some edifices, a

    digger named Leopoldo Batres noticed that they appeared to hold been burned. this

    firing would back up the thought that some foreign folk forced them out.

    But Bateres noticed one other little item that says something different. The

    entombment of some of the smaller edifices was done in a curious fasion: the insides were

    filled with neatly piled rocks suit together with cement. This raises yet another interesting

    inquiry: did the Toltecs destruct their ain metropolis? If this is true, it would merely be more

    grounds of their civilised nature, as no barbarian group of people could hold planned or

    accomplished this effort ( Tompkins, p. 189 ) .


    Other grounds of technological art comes in the signifier of little finds,

    one of which was used in agriculture.

    Teotihuacan posed a job for agriculture, as the whole metropolis was paved. Its

    location besides posed a job: it was built following to no beginning of H2O. It had to

    invariably import H2O from the nearby lake Texcoco. The Toltecs solved this job

    in a alone manner: They brought the harvests to the H2O.

    The Toltecs were Masterss of art and weaving, so they used this accomplishment to assist them

    in their agricultural job. They wove big baskets ( 15 ft. in diameter ) and filled them

    with peat moss. They would so works their harvests in these and float them in organic structures of

    H2O. This clever method could merely hold been thought up through the cooperation

    of many heads ( Burland, p. 40 ) .

    One unusual turn of this Toltec mastermind is one that should hold stunted their ain

    growing: they did non utilize wheels. There is about unanumous understanding that this was

    possibly the most of import innovation in the history of world. Archeologists have found

    wheels in merely one little topographic point in Toltec civilization: plaything. They seemingly ne’er used wheels

    in any type of labour or trucking. It is about as if the thought had ne’er occured to them ( von

    Hagen, Sun, p. 113 ) .

    There may be a logical and simple reply to this enigma. Before the reaching of the

    Spaniards, there were no Equus caballuss in the Americas. The Toltecs no battalion animate beings. If they

    had passenger cars with wheels made to draw heavy weight, who would draw them? The logical

    reply to this 1 would be people, or more specifically, slaves.

    This deficiency of wheels ( if we attribute this to deficiency of battalion animate beings ) would look to state

    that either the Toltecs did non believe of utilizing their slaves to draw the load, or, they had

    no slaves. If I had a slave, the first thing I would do them make is transport my things, and I

    sould think that the Toltecs were every bit smart as I am. So that leaves one option: the Toltecs

    did non hold slaves.

    ( the remainder of this is my ain sentiment )

    Why did the Toltecs non maintain slaves? They were surely capable of deriving

    them. There is grounds that in their wars, they did take captives ; but, these captives

    were used about entirely for forfeit. I think that this shows a certain regard for

    human life, decidedly a civilised trait.

    Toltec Life

    Human life was extremely respected in Toltec civilization. One might believe the antonym

    because, as stated earlier, the Toltecs practiced human forfeit. This may sound like they

    hold no feelings for life, but see this.

    The ground Toltecs ( every bit good as any civilization ) make any sort of offering to the Gods

    is to hold them look favourably upon their people. The ultimate gift for anyone would be

    one ’ s ain life. If you offer a human life to a God, you are giving what means most to

    you. Human life meant a batch to thge Toltecs, which is why they offered it to the Gods.

    Since the greatest gift you can give is life, I will speak about birth.

    When a female parent

    gives birth, it is about a gay juncture. Immediately after birth, an go toing accoucheuse

    congradulates the female parent for holding fought a good conflict and for holding “ captured ” a

    babe. She so speaks to the kid as she would an esteemed, weary traveller, and asks it to

    remainder among its parents ( Townsend, p. 156 ) .

    When the Indian was born, he/she became portion of a group of households who owned a

    piece of land. When it was clip for matrimony, the adult male would be given his ain piece of

    land to populate off. He built his house on the land and was expected to farm it. If, for any

    ground, the adult male did non work the land, it would be taken back by the kin ( von Hagen,

    Sun, p. 36 ) .

    The feminist ideal seemed to be traveling strong at this clip, as is shown by failed

    matrimonies. Divorces were non unheard of in Toltec civilization. If the adult male was non making his

    occupation or back uping his household, the adult female could hold a divorce arranged and be remarried

    to a more ablebodied adult male. Of class, if the adult female was unable to bring forth kids, the

    adult male could besides set up a divorce ( von Hagen, World, p. 35 ) .

    An interesting contrast between Toltecs and another “ civilized ” civilization, early

    Europeans, has to make with single position in the society. In Europe, the people were

    divided by categories. They could non alter what category the were born into, but were stuck

    for life. In the Toltec manner of life, the people were divided by rank. An Indian, when Born,

    was considered an Indian, nil else. This was independant of what rank the parents

    held. Indians were put into political places becauseof their virtue, non their position ( von

    Hagen, Sun, p. 36 ) .

    This shows a cardinal point of view in Toltec civilization. the folk as a whole was

    more of import than any one adult male. This construct went even every bit deep as their instruction.

    From birth, an Indian was taught to work and to go a benificial member of society

    ( Townsend, p. 156 ) .

    These are the traits of a extremely civilised society. Merely a society which has the

    “ Group over One ” mindset can turn to the advanced phase of cultural development that

    the Toltecs achieved.

    Maya and Aztec

    The Toltecs had an consequence on all Mexican civilisations. In this subdivision, I will

    depict the effects the Toltecs had on two major Mexican folk: the Maya and the

    Aztecs. I will get down with the Maya.

    The Maya were a peaceable civilization life in some little towns South of the

    Yucatan. At this clip they had non developed a system of authorship, so archaeologists had to

    infer greatly from their art ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 120 ) .

    Around 900 A.D. , the Mayan peoples began the “ Great Descent, ” in which they

    moved off from the metropoliss and into the Yucatan. During this clip, the Mayan civilization

    sunk to an all clip low ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 120 ) . Soon after the Great Descent, a adult male

    and his followings arived in the Yucatan. This adult male taught the Maya his cognition and

    reconstruct the derelict Maya metropolis Chichen Itza. This began the Mayan Renaissance. They

    developed their ain authorship system and their ain manner of archetecture ( von Hagen, Sun,

    p. 332 ) .

    In clip, the adult male who came from the West built the Maya capitol, Mayapan. The

    Maya adopted this adult male as their male monarch and savior, naming him Kukulcan, which, in Maya,

    agencies “ feathered snake ” ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 332 ) .

    Many similarities between the Mayan metropolis Chichen Itza and the Toltec ’ s Tula give

    more grounds for this narrative. Before I show you these similarities, though, I will give a

    short description of each metropolis.

    After go forthing Teotihuacan, the Toltecs moved north about 50 stat mis. There, they

    built the metropolis of Tula. Tula seems to hold been built because of the demand of a metropolis, as there

    seems to hold been much less be aftering involved than at Teotihuacan. There is none of the

    elegant symmetricalness like that shown at Teotihuacan. The houses were laid out in a really

    hapazard mode ; room layout was non planned at all. The lone planning that seems to

    have taken topographic point was in the temples, castle and ball tribunals ( Sabloff, pp. 192-193 ) .

    After it was built, Tula, or the legendary Tollan, as the Aztecs called it, embodied

    all that was great in Teotihuacan, and more. No 1 showed the grandeour better than the

    Spanish monastic Bernardo de Sahagun when he described Tula as holding “ rich castles of

    green jade and white and ruddy shell, where the ears of maize and Cucurbita pepos reached the size

    of a adult male, where cotton grew in the works in all colorss and the air was filled with rare birds

    of cherished plume … ” ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 30 ) . Truly, this was a antic topographic point.

    About the same thing could be said about Chichen Itza. Chichen Itza was a

    reasonably sized metropolis, but was the centre of Mayan civilization at the clip of its tallness.

    The major edifice in Chichen Itza is the temple of Kukulkan. From this construction,

    al things radiate. From the forepart runs a big ceremonial paseo, which leads to a big

    good, called a cenote. Into this was thrown treasures and gems and other cherished points.

    Sacrificial victims were besides thrown in ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 168 ) .

    To the right of the temple is a big tribunal in which they played the great ball game,

    Pok-a-tok. The game was non unlike hoops, in that the participants had to acquire a gum elastic ball

    into a hoop, even though that hoop was 30 ft high and perpendicular. The participants could merely

    utilize their elbws or hips. This was a large event, equaling a forfeit, and the witnesss bet

    to a great extent ( von Hagen, Sun, 162 ) .

    To the left lay the temple of the Warriors, which contained the local market. To

    the rear lay the remains of the old metropolis ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 168 ) .

    The similarities are difficult to lose when seeing the two of them. The easiest illustration

    to see are the temples. Both the temple of Kukulkan and the temple of Tula are built in

    the signifier of the abbreviated pyramid. A abbreviated pyramid has four sides with each side

    looking like a big stairway. Each Temple has a staircase on each of the four sides and an

    enclosed construction at the top ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 195 ) .

    The temple of the Warriors was built in the same fasion, but had two similar

    characteristics found nowhere outside of Toltec influence. On the outskirts of both temples,

    there are 100s of equally separated pillars used to keep up wooden roof beams. Merely the

    temple of the Warriors and the temple of Tula had those. The other characteristically

    Toltec characteristic on both temples are the chac-mools. Both chac-mools are about precisely

    the same except for different facial characteristics ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 195 ) .

    Another characteristic similar about the two citiex is their art. In Tula, many motives have

    been found picturing processing panthers and bird of Joves. That really same thing has been found

    in Chichen Itza ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 196 ) .

    Possibly the most of import piece of information has to make with Quetzalcoatl.

    Earlier, I said that he traveled to Yucatan. This is non precisely true. This has been infered

    by some dry historical events. First, about 987 A.D, Quetzalcoatl was said to hold left

    Tula. At about the same clip in Mayan history, the adult male named Kukulkan arived in the

    Yucatan. The Mayas loved him so much that they made him their male monarch. Kukulkan so

    proceeded to learn them his civilization. While he was making this, the Mayas went through

    their won Renaissance and their civilization was restarted. No uncertainty Kukulkan had something

    to make with this ( von Hagen, Sun, p. 332 ) .

    Let us seek a simple thought experiment. The Mayas are considered by

    archaeologists to hold been civilized. I do non hold the clip, nor the infinite to turn out this,

    so we will take it as a fact. The Mayas became civilized after Kukulkan taught them his

    ways. It would follow that Kukulkan, himself, was civilized. Therefore, since he was

    originally Toltec, this would do the Toltecs, themselves, civilized.

    The Aztecs were by far the most popular civilisation of all time to originate in Mexico.

    Most of the histories of the Toltecs came frome them. They held the Toltecs in the

    highest regard, even establishing their ain civilization on them.

    When the Aztecs moved in around lake Texcoco, they found the ruins of

    Teotihuacan and other little metropoliss. They were in awe of the technological degree of the

    builders and gave them the name “ Toltec, ” which means “ builder ” or “ creative person ” ( Tompkins,

    p. 20 ) . They so burned all the historical records and wrote their ain, seting the

    Toltecs in the paramount place. They believed they were the posterities of the Toltecs

    ( von Hagen, Aztec, p. 39 ) .

    Looking at the architecture, art, imposts, and faith of the Aztecs, one discoveries

    about perfect simularity. The Aztecs took about every thing from the Toltecs. They

    built the same manner temples, had the same Gods, used the same artistic manner, and

    performed the same human forfeit rites. One even finds the familiar chac-mool atop

    many of the temples.

    The Toltec civilization was so great that, non merely did it go throughout Mexico, but

    besides traveled beyond the grave.


    Not merely did the Toltecs stress the group and excell in engineering, but they

    besides taught two folks to go civilised. Stressing the group is a cardinal factor in

    civilised civilizations. If everyone in a group works for themselves, they are restricting their ain

    promotion. But, if they all work for the group, the group will thrive and turn.

    Technology is a necessary by-product of civilisation. When people come up with

    thoughts that will benifit the group, the thoughts normally take the signifier of innovations. When

    people work in groups, the single thoughts of the people travel through the coevalss.

    These two actions, when done together, consequence in useable engineering that benifits all.

    The Toltec ideals for society worked for both the Maya and the Aztecs. These

    civilizations grew to be the two most good known civilisations in Mexico. This says a batch for

    the Toltecs. It says that the Toltecs were the male parents of civilisation.

    When Cortez landed in the thick of the Aztecs, what he was witnessing was the

    digesting Toltec civilization. He so saw a human forfeit and decided the destiny of these

    barbarian people. A civilised civilization is one that does non destruct every other civilization

    because of different beliefs. One must inquire, which is more civilised: human forfeit

    or race murder.

    One little choice morsel about day of the months. When Quetzalcoatl sailed off to the West, he left the

    Mayas with a prophesy. “ On the return of this day of the month, 1-Reed, I will return to Mexico. ”

    I was inquiring if Quetzalcoatl of all time did return and did some research on the topic.

    Looking at the day of the months, I made a startling find. The twelvemonth 1-Reed falls on the twelvemonth

    1512, the twelvemonth Cortez landed in Mexico. This was a haunting disclosure, and can be

    interpreted in many ways. One can state that it was happenstance, but I don ’ t take to believe

    so. I think Quetzalcoatl knew what he was stating, but encrypted the message. I think he

    cognize what was traveling to go on. . .


    History of the World. Bureau Development, Inc. , 1992.

    Burland, C. A. The Gods of Mexico. New York: G. P. Putnam ’ s Sons, 1967: 32, 34, 40.

    Gruzinski, Serge. The Aztecs- Rise and Fall of an Empire. New York: Harry N. Abrams

    Inc. , 1992: 14, 15.

    Sabloff, Jeremy A. The Cities of Ancient Mexico. New York, New York: Thames and

    Hudson Inc. , 1989: 108, 112, 192, 193.

    Tompkins, Peter. Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids. New York: Harper & A ; Row, Inc. ,

    1976: 20, 189, 334.

    Townsend, Richard F. The Aztecs. New York: Thames & A ; Hudson Inc. , 1992: 46, 49,

    50, 156.

    von Hagen, Victor Wolfgang. The Ancient Sun Kingdoms of the Americas. Great

    Britain: Thames & A ; Hudson Ltd. , 1962: 14, 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 36, 85, 113,

    120, 131, 154, 155, 162, 168, 170, 193, 195, 196, 332.

    _______________________ . The Aztec: Man and Tribe. New York: Signet, 1958: 39.

    _______________________ . Maya: Land of the Turkey and the Deer. Cleveland, Ohio:

    World Publishing Co. , 1960: 39.

    _______________________.. World of the Maya. New York: Signet Classicss, 1960:


    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Toltec Civilization Research Paper Toltec Civilization. (2017, Jul 10). Retrieved from

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Feel free to contact us anytime, we are always ready to help you!

    How did the Toltec civilization start?
    Origins & Spread. The Toltecs had roots in the Tolteca-Chichimeca people, who, during the 9th century, had migrated from the deserts of the north-west to Culhuacan in the Valley of Mexico.
    What was significant about the Toltec civilization and empire?
    The Toltec civilization was renowned for its craftsmanship, building prowess, and inventiveness. They were one of the great civilizations of Mesoamerica, and left a major impact on the cultures that followed.
    Which civilization was influenced by the Toltecs?
    Toltec culture proved to be very influential throughout Mesoamerica, impacting the Maya to the south and the other Nahuatl-speaking people of central Mexico (eventually including the Aztecs as well).

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper
    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy