The main argument presented in Leonid Fridman’s “America Needs Its Nerds” is that the United States is placing too much importance on social and physical abilities, while neglecting academic achievement. Fridman supports his argument through the use of connotative diction, a disappointed tone, and rhetorical questions. He highlights the negative connotations surrounding the emphasis on social skills and physical prowess compared to academics in the United States.
According to Fridman, university professorships are considered prestigious and financially rewarding in many parts of the world. However, in America, average professional ballplayers are given more respect and better pay than faculty members at top universities. This use of the word “But” immediately after discussing the rewards elsewhere paints a negative image of America’s prioritization of “average ballplayers” over academically accomplished individuals.
The author’s use of negative language strengthens the argument that the United States is prioritizing other aspects over academics, as it portrays America’s choices in a negative light. Fridman consistently expresses disappointment with the nation’s preference for physical strength over intellectual pursuits. His question, “How can a country… be expected to compete in the technology race with Japan or remain a leading political and cultural force in Europe?” not only prompts readers to answer, but also demonstrates Fridman’s belief that America will fall behind Japan and other European countries if it continues to prioritize athletes over intellectually accomplished and curious scientists who could potentially make significant discoveries. By posing this question, Fridman reinforces his argument and adds a sense of disappointment, making his assertion more compelling. The conclusion of Fridman’s piece also includes a rhetorical question, further strengthening his argument.
Concluding his piece, Leonid Fridman asked a rhetorical question: “how long can America remain a world-class power if we constantly emphasize social skills and physical prowess over academic achievement and intellectual ability?” This question added strength to his argument and made it more effective. Additionally, Fridman’s use of connotative diction, a disappointed tone, and rhetorical questioning gradually increased the persuasiveness of his argument throughout the piece.
