Are humanities relevant to the 21st century

Table of Content

In this annotated bibliography I will be seeking to reply the inquiry of the importance of humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. I will be utilizing beginnings from newspapers. books and web logs in which I found either in the UEA library. cyberspace and other beginnings of information. I will be doing sum-ups of the content which I read and evaluate the beginning as a whole. for this annotated bibliography most of the beginnings which I came across coincidentally were about the utility of the humanistic disciplines in instruction or in the work topographic point in the twenty-first century. In add-on. I incorporated movie. literature. art and history devising my scope of beginnings wide.

1 ) Arnheirn Rudolf. 1932. movie as Art. London. university of California imperativeness This book is chiefly about theory. the writers chief statement is that human existences are losing their ability of creativeness. For illustration. the writer negotiations about the “limitations of the medium. the absence of sound. the absence of coloring material and the deficiency of three dimensional depth” Arnheirn Rudolf ( 1932 ) . these restrictions created a new distinguishable art nevertheless due to advancement everything is about pragmatism and because of these advancement creativeness has been lost in the universe of movie.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

“The ideas that made the image move” Arnheirn Rudolf ( 1932 ) can be interpreted as pragmatism conveying truths of universe into the spotlight such as the force which occurred around the universe. As a beginning it has really small relevancy to the humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. when reading this book it seemed really personal to the writer the manner he wrote it seemed as if he is supporting something really of import to him. Besides. from what I had read at that place wasn’t much grounds to back up his claims and was more like an aggressive harangue about the mechanical promotions in the movie industry.

2 ) Belfiore Elenora and Upchurch Anna. 2013. Humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. Hampshire. Palgrave Macmillan This book is chiefly a aggregation of essays and articles from different writers that has been edited by the writers. They talk chiefly about the connexion between the markets and the humanistic disciplines. Their chief purpose was to “exercise of reviewing the present province of the humanistic disciplines within and outside of the academic practise” Belfiore Elenora and Upchurch Anna ( 2013 ) .

The writers describe the history of the humanistic disciplines and stated that the humanistic disciplines came from the united provinces which spread to great Britain and so explained that societal scientific discipline came out of humanistic disciplines which is why the humanistic disciplines is the parent of the societal scientific discipline. The two writers compiled a aggregation of original essays that tackle the inquiry nevertheless I did non read any positions the writers had. 3 ) Corrigan herd’s grass. 2012. movie and literature: and debut and reader. 2nd edition. Abingdon. Routledge.

Timothy Corrigan’s chief statement is that he argues without the literature there will be no movie and they need each other. “While the blockbusters harry potter movies would invariably pull multitudes of immature people/readers to the film theaters and lines of motion-picture fans into the bookstore” Corrigan herd’s grass ( 2012 ) . He besides argues there is a renewed involvement in literature and movie as “30 % of films today derive from novels and 50 % of books classified as best Sellerss have been adapted to cinema” which enforces his statement that literature in fact is still of import.

Subsequently in the chapter he gives disadvantages of turning novels into movie by saying it destroys our imaginativeness. When reading a novel we use our imaginativeness to make a world in the novels universe nevertheless when watching a movie adaptation of that same novel your imagined universe becomes the movie managers reading and your imagined creative activity is lost. In this book the writer clearly states 4 disadvantages of literature and non one positive or advantages to literature doing me believe that his positions to a certain extent is biased.

In add-on. this book contains bucket tonss of information from theories to history of movie and this book is an educational one therefore contains information directed to pupils and is besides the 2nd edition by and large intending is an betterment to the first edition. 4 ) Grafton Anthony. ( 2010 ) . 05/11/2013. Defending the Humanities. World Wide Web. youtube. com Grafton Anthony is a historian that delivered a talk in the University of Hampshire. He argues against a claim that humanities as a topic is ‘dying’ .

His statement boldly states that professors learning the humanity topics are being force provender useless cognition and information which will non assist undergraduates in the hereafter. He states that humanists should be Godheads of conversations between the alumnuss. the historical minds. ancient instrumentalists and great creative persons which is critical and exciting. alternatively of making of theories and bead everything we teach though it ‘like a sausage grinder’ . He concludes. and states that humanistic disciplines as a topic is bettering and is ever being rewritten when new information is available.

Grafton Anthony uses the American civil war as an illustration. as a kid Grafton Anthony in school had ne’er heard of the presence of the African Americans in the civil war and parents would ne’er take their kids to historic conflict sites because they felt offended. However. in today’s age African American parents gleefully take their kids to these sites due to historians re-writing history and making a true narrative that African Americans were in fact involved in the civil war.

This talk was truly about advancing humanistic disciplines as a topic. This is a good beginning as it emphases the jobs of humanistic disciplines being taught in the twenty-first century and besides gives information on how to better humanistic disciplines in general in add-on ; his points are being reinforced by Bill Smoot who besides had similar political orientations. 5 ) Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James. 2013. the history of higher instruction: the humanistic disciplines doubtful conflict. 19th October 2013. pages 13.

The writers as a drumhead fundamentally belittles the humanistic disciplines and negotiations about history are non needed in the economic and capitalist universe. He quotes “Why would a company like Enterprise Rent-A-Car attention if a prospective employee took the enterprise to read the company history? What could the survey of the past contribute to a calling in. state. medicate? ” Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James ( 2013 ) . He besides makes the point that the humanistic disciplines do non take into any clear cut calling than let’s say technology. medical specialty and jurisprudence.

They so go on to state that the humanistic disciplines is non wholly dead as from a Harvard study stated that there are more people analyzing humanistic disciplines in private universities and are chiefly for the ‘elites’ “Humanities instruction provides the foundation for leading. and wider entree to such instruction implies wider entree to places of leading. ” Grafton t. Anthony and Grossman James ( 2013 ) . Personally I didn’t like this beginning as the writers somewhat changed their position from saying that the humanistic disciplines is a rubbish topic to larn to the humanistic disciplines being this heroic poem topic that merely the ‘elites’ should larn.

The beginning was really simple to read and it seem to ‘speak’ to you as if you were holding a conversation with the author and made you think about topic. In add-on. an article which eventually sits on the other side for a alteration. It was interesting to happen a beginning and writers who argued that humanistic disciplines is useless so reading from an nonsubjective position it was a new penetration into the topic of the relevancy of humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. 6 ) Kagan Jeome. ( 2009 ) The Three Cultures: Natural Science. Social Sciences. and the Humanities in the twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University imperativeness.

This book defines the three civilizations and so compares them to one another. The author’s chief statement is that the three civilizations can non last without the fuel each civilization provides. One illustration used is climate alteration kagon Jeome ( 2009 ) stated 50. 000 old ages ago climate changed in northern Europe which destroyed our protein supplies and in bend the human population in northern Europe dropped drastically hence if worlds were involved in clime alteration it would be more rapid.

The writer so concludes that the scientific disciplines and humanistic disciplines need each other and are both of import to the twenty-first century as without the literature humanities provided the less likely research may hold taken topographic point. The writer is American psychologist proposing that he is really good educated and has written many books in respect to psychological science. the book was besides published by the Cambridge university imperativeness significance that it is more likely to be rational. The book was written in 2009 which in respect to humanistic disciplines and his major points is non excessively long ago.

However. this book was fundamentally a revamp C. P. Snow’s work who was a chemist and novelist who published “the two civilizations and scientific revolution” which was written in 1959. 7 ) Pring Richard. 1999. oxford reappraisal of instruction. political instruction: relevancy of the humanistic disciplines. p71-87. volume 25 issue. Taylor and Francis. In this article the Richard Pring puts an accent on instruction being used as tool to command the immature to going a theoretical account citizen and uses the phrase “developing desirable attitudes” .

He following explains why he used that phrase and backs up his point by saying the “government is worried about the ingestion of drugs amongst immature people ; hence. schools are being instructed to learn about their evil effects” . Furthermore subsequently on in the article he explains why the humanistic disciplines is of import non merely because the humanistic disciplines teaches us how to be ”Human” but it gives us the accomplishments to integrate into political relations such as critical authorship and analysis. This diary is really elaborate but is instead old compared to grounds I can get from books. web logs or other signifiers of beginnings.

A batch of things have changed since 1999 such as the economic system. which has gone through major alterations during this clip so positions have changed. In footings of relevancy to the inquiry is that it is relevant to a strong extent from a cultural position. He describes that humanistic disciplines is all around us and is impossible to lose. 8 ) Small Helen. 2013. the value of the humanistic disciplines. Oxford. Oxford university imperativeness The book value of the humanistic disciplines provides a critical history of the chief statements used to support the value of the Humanities.

The claims considered are: that the Humanities study the meaning-making patterns of civilization. and convey to their work a typical apprehension of what constitutes cognition and apprehension. The writers of this book made a really deep statements from the part of human felicity to the “driving force for democracy” Small Helen ( 2013 ) . She subsequently concludes that the intent of the humanistic disciplines is to research the evidences for each statement. and prove its cogency for the present twenty-four hours and “promise to sharpen the footings of public debate” Small Helen ( 2013 ) .

I believe this a really good beginning. foremost because it is really modern and up to day of the month. academic somewhat difficult to read aimed at the educated and bookmans. The writer is a professor of the English literature at the University of Oxford which suggests she is smart plenty to look at this inquiry from an nonsubjective position. 9 ) Smoot Bill. ( 2011 ) . 04/11/2013. Humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. edutopia. org/blog/humanities-twenty-first-century-bill-smoot. Online Blog This web log offers information about the humanistic disciplines in the twenty-first century. the writer writes about his personal experience and feelings to the violent death of Osama Bin Laden.

He writes about how he felt satisfied for the violent death of a adult male who may or may non of deserved it and as a English instructor he takes an nonsubjective expression on different people’s reactions to the intelligence and provinces he saw people shouting and praising the decease of a adult male. another group were apathetic and quoted “it is unhallowed to triumph over the organic structures of the dead” Smoot Bill ( 2011 ) . He subsequently explains that we need humanistic disciplines to learn the pupils habits ‘of critical idea and the historical position necessary for citizenship in a democracy’ .

The web log is aimed for people in the place of power. In footings. of relevancy to the inquiry I believe it answers the inquiry because his simplistic authorship explains why humanistic disciplines are needed in the twenty-first century. However. a web log is an single record of sentiments so it does non transport weight as a good beginning but it gives an sentiment so in that regard it becomes utile but non really dependable. 10 ) Stern Nicholas. Mon 22 July 2013. Don’t neglect the importance of the humanistic disciplines. the independent. pages 7.

In this beginning. the message is a batch more political. First Nicolas Stern describes that there is a displacement in every topic due to the deficiency of trust in intuition and deficiency of assurance in bing thoughts and theoretical accounts and politicians are non animating the younger coevalss. He subsequently describes the Science. technology and medical specialty are critical drivers of human advancement and we must observe and foster them. However. without the humanistic disciplines and societal scientific disciplines we can ne’er happen responses to the pressing issues that problem us.

He so backs up his points with facts and figures for illustration “The UK economic system is now 75 per cent services. enormously reliant on the analytical. negotiating and communicating accomplishments which humanistic disciplines and societal scientific disciplines subjects develop in people” Nicolas Stern ( 2013 ) and “Most of the leaders in public life – authorities. commercialism. public sector – were educated in humanistic disciplines and societal scientific discipline subjects. ” Nicolas Stern ( 2013 ) . In my sentiment I believe this is a really good beginning as the writer makes a point and so backs up his points with grounds and statistics.

It is besides a newspaper article significance that the general populace have entree to it and make an sentiment about the affair. However. the lone disadvantage about this article is that the writer doesn’t write about the advantages and disadvantages of humanistic disciplines and merely keeps to the positives and belittles other topics. 11 ) Vianello Andrea 16/11/2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. bronzeage. org. uk/the-value-of-the-arts-and-humanities-in-the-21st-century-a-report. aspx. blog The writer of the web log describes that he went to a argument about the importance of the humanistic disciplines and humanistic disciplines in the modern twenty-four hours life and concern.

During this argument the writer states that at this argument everyone assumed that they all agreed on the fact that “the humanistic disciplines in modern twenty-four hours society are reasonably much over due to the topic holding no impact on modern society” Vianello Andrea ( 2013 ) . The writer concludes ; with his ain personal sentiment which was that the value of the humanistic disciplines is alone in footings of the manner humanists’ think and its potency for scientific disciplines and concerns and that alumnuss who have studied the humanistic disciplines have been equipped with movable accomplishments and a alone manner to near and work out jobs.

The writer makes valid points with grounds which makes the writer statement about this topic stronger nevertheless. he criticized in a negative visible radiation all the research workers and educated sentiment that did non hold with his side of the statement doing his position really personal non keep a batch of weight as a beginning. In footings of relevancy to the inquiry it is really relevant nevertheless due to his sentiment being really personal and biased it’s a useless beginning and weak in footings of statement.

12 ) Warwick Clare. Terras Mellissa. Nyhan Julianne. 2012. Digital humanistic disciplines in practise. London. Facat publication. The writers open up with the definition of what digital humanistic disciplines is and defined it as “the coaction of the humanistic disciplines and humanistic disciplines with computing” Warwick Clare. Terras Mellissa. Nyhan Julianne ( 2012 ) . The book chiefly talks about the experience of three people in the University of City London which is the taking university for digital humanistic disciplines.

Cite this page

Are humanities relevant to the 21st century. (2016, Nov 18). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront