Hamlet by William Shakespeare: analysis of the main character

Table of Content

Passionately recommended by a majority, William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is deemed credible, intricate, and intellectual by readers of all professions. In fact, not only is Hamlet said to be Shakespeare’s greatest work, but it is often titled the greatest playwright of all time as well. Intermittently, however, do people recognize the fundamental flaws of the play. Hamlet’s lack of character development, sloppy structure, and an odd similarity to another Elizabethan tragedy—The Spanish Tragedy by Thomas Kyd— all prove that Hamlet does not even come close to living up to the credibility and extensive publicity assumed by many readers of Hamlet.

The character of Hamlet is praised for his deep, analytical thought and his complexity of emotions, but Hamlet is nothing more than an unstable, emotional ruin; in fact, all other characters in the play follow this lack of complexity too.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Hamlet additionally analyzes himself to the on-screen character who had the option to turn out to be so enthusiastic about something inconsequential and asks why he doesn’t have that sort of energy about something as significant as his father’s demise. He starts his speech with the renowned line ‘To be, or to not be?’ Within this line Hamlet is brooding whether is it better to be alive or rather off dead.

In addition to the fact that he is, as most people, terrified of the obscure, but at the same time he’s frightened of submitting a wrongdoing and dooming his spirit. Hamlet is considering life and demise, contemplating a condition of being versus a condition of not being life and being dead. ‘To be or to not be’ is trailed by ‘that will be that the inquiry.’ Life might be an absence of influence, helpless before fortune. Passing is enabling, permitting the annihilation of fortune. To kick the bucket however, activity in life is required , making the suggestion round and miserable. What’s more, eternal life is an obscure, perhaps more terrible than life itself. it’s the acceptable inquiry that Hamlet is posing about human presence for the most part and his own reality particularly a reflected picture on whether it’s smarter to be alive or to be dead.

Passing is in this way enabling: executing oneself could likewise be the manner by which of making a move, waging war, restricting and overcoming the slings and bolts of absurd fortune. Living might be an inactive state; kicking the bucket is an exuberant state. In any case, in order to prevail in the state of death one must make a move in life charge completely outfitted against Fortune in this way the entire recommendation is round and sad in light of the fact that one doesn’t generally have the office of activity throughout everyday life.

With that idea, Hamlet stops to reevaluate. what will happen once we have disposed of all the rushing about of life? The issue with the recommendation is that eternal life is obscure and will be more regrettable than life. It’s a truly terrifying idea. That is the impediment on the garden and it redirects his contemplations to an alternate heading. What’s more, presently Hamlet thinks about a last end. An ‘end’ might be a lawful word sense a last complete end to a contention. He restricts this Latin word against the Celtic ‘perspiring’ and ‘snorting’ of a living individual as a Bedouin underneath an overwhelmingly substantial burden a fardel, the heap conveyed by a camel. Who might bear that when he could simply draw a line under existence with something as straightforward as a needle a bodkin? It’s very large idea and it’s intriguing that this colossal demonstration drawing a line under life are frequently through with something as basic as a needle . what’s more, the manner in which simple that appears.

Hamlet currently lets his creative mind meander on the subject of the journeys of revelation and in this manner the exploratory undertakings. Biting the dust resembles crossing the fringe among known and obscure topography. One is presumably going to be lost in that unmapped spot, from which one could stay away for the indefinite future. The suggestion is that there could likewise be unheard of detestations in that land. Hamlet presently appears to shape a decision .This sentence is maybe the first significant one inside the discourse. There’s a profound measurement thereto in light of the fact that it might be just plain wrong to require one’s life. So immediately included measurement, the dread of the obscure after death is escalated. Be that as it may, there’s more thereto than that. It’s not practically executing himself yet in addition about the mission he’s on – to retaliate for his father’s demise by slaughtering his father’s killer.

Cite this page

Hamlet by William Shakespeare: analysis of the main character. (2022, Nov 22). Retrieved from


Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront