William Shakespeare’s tragic drama Macbeth is set in 11th-century Scotland. The overarching political system so was feudal system. a system that was “based on the retention of land” and placed “an increasing accent on local protection. local authorities. and local self-sufficiency” ( World History. Section 9-4. pp. 214 ** ) . Shakespeare. nevertheless. lived during the late 16th and early seventeenth century. a clip in which male monarchs with “absolute authority” and “divine right” ( W. H. Section 18-3. pp. 430 ) ruled a strongly centralized state. His dramas of course revealed his penchant of a strong centralised monarchy over a feudal authorities.
which was stable but out-of-date. Therefore. Macbeth. arguably Shakespeare’s most political drama. reflects a apparently stable feudal system full of elusive failings while at the same time demoing the tendency towards centralisation and boding the future Age of Kings.
In agreement with the scene of the drama. the imposts and rubrics held by the characters in Macbeth reflect feudal traditions and clearly uncover a feudal authorities. The chief dogma of feudal system is the exchange of vows. described by Galbert of Bruges: “The count asked if he was willing to go wholly his adult male. and the other replied: ‘I am willing ; ’ [ … ] Afterward… [ the count ] gave coronation to…who by this understanding had given his…oath” ( Sources. Section 7-7. pg. 216 ) . The count gives his liege a wages in return for trueness. In Macbeth. Duncan condemns the faithless Thane of Cawdor to decease and at the same time gives Macbeth a 2nd feoff for his triumph in conflict ( Macbeth. Act 1. Scene 3. ll. 74-76 ) .
These actions are a cloaked and cunning effort to guarantee or beef up the firm trueness of Duncan’s lieges. Macbeth answers by saying that “your Highness’ portion is to have our duties…safe toward your love and honor” ( Macbeth. Act 1. Scene 4. ll. 26-27 ) . This duologue itself illustrates a elusive ‘exchange of vows’ described by Galbert. As it is the equivalent of a modern-day written contract. interrupting the curse of trueness given during the ceremonial of coronation is a badly punished act of perfidy. Hence Macbeth ponders the immorality of his blackwash secret plan: “He’s here in dual trust: First. as I am his kinsman and his topic. strong both against the deed” ( Macbeth. Act 1. Scene 7. ll. 12-14 ) . Last. the rubrics and personalities of the characters themselves are feudal ( for illustration the assorted “Thanes” ) – clearly portraying a stable feudal universe.
However. Shakespeare. as a dramatist in monarchial England. intelligibly besides exposes and illustrates the basic defects of feudal system. The feudal pyramid consisted of “many knights…with a little fief” . above them their royal lieges “who held larger fiefs” . and “over all…the king” ( W. H. Section 9-4. pp. 215 ) . Keeping order among the powerful Lords was a hard undertaking for any swayer ; merely a strong male monarch would be able to exert authorization and maintain any rebellions or rebellious Acts of the Apostless to a lower limit or at least in complete cheque. On the surface. Duncan seems to suit this description. Harmonizing to Macbeth. he is “so clear in his great office…that his virtuousnesss will plead like angels” ( Macbeth. Act 1. Scene 7. ll. 18-19 ) . However. both Macdonwald and the Thane of Cawdor start a rebellion against the King. who depends on his other. loyal. thanes to oppress the rebellion and gaining control the treasonists ; seemingly. he personally does non take part.
Feudal Godheads and lieges were expected to take part in war ( Bertran de Born. Beginnings. Section 7-7. pg. 217 ) . and Duncan’s inability or involuntariness to direct his ground forcess is a failing. ( If the Thanes decide to take him from his throne. there is small the male monarch can make against it. ) This shows the primary ‘loophole’ in the feudal system: if the male monarch of a host of lieges is weak. so he becomes a front man instead than an existent leader. and the full country is farther decentralized and isolated as lieges become more independent. Although this defect is normally inevitable. Macbeth presents an even more critical position of the affair – the blackwash of Duncan by Macbeth. who replaces him. The events following that act lead to more pandemonium. blood. and war: “A Swift approval may shortly return to this our agony state. under a manus accursed” ( Macbeth. Act 3. Scene 6. ll. 53-55 ) . Shakespeare clearly demonstrates the jobs with feudal system.
In the terminal. Macbeth portrays the diminution of feudal system and the rise of greater centralisation as a welcomed alteration. Shakespeare normally includes and remarks on the historical events happening around the times in which his dramas are set. 11th-century Scotland was sing a passage from the Age of Feudalism to the Age of Kings. as powerful Godheads gained increasing sums of lands and “began to beef up their control over their ain lands” ( W. H. Section 10-3. pp. 233 ) . In Macbeth. the signifier of authorities is in pattern wholly feudal. yet the first intimations of impending alteration Begin to look.
Duncan is invariably referred to as ‘King of Scotland’ instead than as a Godhead. and the Crown is inherited by birthright: “Our firstborn. Malcolm. [ … ] we name hereinafter the Prince of Cumberland” ( Macbeth. Act 1. Scene 4. ll. 44-45 ) . The great bastioned palaces of Scotland. the seats of power of Duncan and his Lords. demo centralisation at a little degree. perchance connoting the future strength of male monarchs. Yet the most obvious illustration of historical prefiguration is the concluding address made by Malcolm as he regains the throne. He gives the Thanes a new rubric – that of Earls. “the foremost that of all time Scotland in such an award named” ( Macbeth. Act 5. Scene 8. ll. 72-88 ) . This alteration symbolizes the morning of a new epoch of royal power and cardinal authorities.
Obviously. Macbeth portrays the feudal universe predominant in Europe. emphasizing its failings. and foreshadows the historical transportation of power from feudal Godheads to male monarchs. In fact. most of the drama is either historical or political. England’s King James I strongly supported Shakespeare. and he claimed he was a descendent of Banquo. Therefore. although the historical Macbeth was a baronial and merely swayer. in Shakespeare’s drama he is depicted as an ambitious and pitiless autocrat. while Banquo is low and modest. Clearly. William Shakespeare wrote many dramas with historical significance behind them. of course affected by his thoughts or sentiments. Macbeth is one of them.
** Mentions refer to the Folger Library edition of ‘Macbeth’ . the primary beginning book ‘Sources of Western Civilization’ . and the book ‘World History: Positions On The Past’ .
Cite this Analysis of Feudalism in William Shakespeare’s ”Macbeth” Sample
Analysis of Feudalism in William Shakespeare’s ”Macbeth” Sample. (2017, Jul 18). Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/analysis-of-feudalism-in-william-shakespeares-macbeth-essay-sample-3905/