Mongol vs. Viking

Compare the Mongol invasions in Eurasia to the Viking invasions in Northern Europe. Compare them in footings of historical significance over clip and impacting many people

The two invasions have noticeable differences along with some similarities. They are different in the sense that the Mongol invasions caused disunity and did non profit any of the lands they conquered in cardinal Asia. Russia. Persia because they wrecked more havoc than any benefits in the long tally by for good damaging lands that took centuries to retrieve from. they spread the bubonic pestilence to assorted parts killing 1000000s through biological/chemical warfare and since they were invariably traveling and did non hold lasting colonies. The Mongols began migrating and suppressing different lands because much of their graze and farming lands had become occupied or used up. Unlike the Vikings. the Mongols used their conquered peoples ( the Persians ) to run their authorities to maintain it stabilised.

Academic anxiety?
Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task
Get your paper price

124 experts online

Similar to the Vikings ; they imposed their authorization through their fierceness and their Swift hit and tallies. They were both really nomadic groups who seldom settled in lasting colonies and stuck to quick hit and run onslaughts at unexpected times on their enemies. Both groups went out for land and for goods that they invade and take control of because they could non fabricate specific goods they needed or wanted. The Vikings unlike the Mongols. really benefited northern Europe in the long tally by doing the integrity of the Germanic peoples of England who put their differences aside in order to support themselves against the Vikings. similar to that in Germany where the invasion ended Carolingian regulation. but lead to the integrity of an effectual province to support against the Vikings. The invasions encouraged decentralized political order in France and led to the rise of local governments. Unlike the Mongols who attacked on land. the Vikings were sea plunderers.

The Vikings were originally Scandinavian merchandisers and bargainers. but as the developed antic sea accomplishments in edifice ships and sailing them. they became plunderers who plundered lands opposed to the Mongols who were ever ferocious enemies of Asia who were ever busting lands. The Vikings set out to happen new lands and bust them due to population force per unit areas and oppressive Christian churches the imposed Christianity and wanted to destruct the Vikings’ heathen beliefs.

Bentley. Jerry H. and Ziegler. Herbert F. A Global Perspective on the Past. McGraw-Hill. 2006. Pages 440-443

This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your requirements?

Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

Order custom paper Without paying upfront

Mongol vs. Viking. (2017, Jul 09). Retrieved from