No Country for Old Men Research Paper Sample

Table of Content

Cormac McCarthy’s novel. No State for Old Men. enlightens the life of Llewellyn Moss. a welder and Vietnam veteran. who happens to falter upon several murdered organic structures. a sufficient supply of cocaine. and two million dollars of trust drug money. Moss decides to prehend the money and accordingly sets off a pursuit for his life against the old manus sheriff Ed Tom Bell and hired psychopathologic killer Anton Chigurh. However. McCarthy basically exploits Moss’ and Chigurh’s escapade merely as a subplot and finally conveys a deeper significance. The novelist to a great extent relies on Bell’s failure to accommodate his ethical motives of the attack offense used to take old ages earlier. Through analysing the characters. moral relativism. and the revelatory subject. Bell’s grudges begins to look more agreeable as the novel progresses. Symbolically. Chigurh represents devastation that may shortly get the better of a current society. With the compulsion of worldly points. people begin to lose all sense of unity with the strong demand for coveted wants. Shipali Sharma justifies with. “the Greed of possessing mercenary things and the intense desire to hold a epicurean life by any possible agencies leads a individual to follow this path of crime” ( Sharma ) .

As for Chigurh’s character. he will put to death a ruthless killing fling merely for the return of the stolen money. In add-on. Chigurh’s hankering for control ignites his motivation for the countless slayings. Harmonizing to a recent article about condemnable psychological science. “The condemnable normally attacks weak victims who are unarmed in order to be in control and to experience superior” ( Radwan ) . For case. the “Coin Flip” scene shows the mercy slayer Anton Chigurh put the life of a gas station proprietor up against a somersault of a coin. The reader can easy see how McCarthy sets up Chigurh as a warped universe position that remains consistent throughout the full novel. This deeply dialogued scene opens with the gas station proprietor inquiring an guiltless inquiry about the conditions ; nevertheless. Chigurh rapidly twists the exchange into a battle for life or decease. After a short barter of words. the proprietor realizes the simple conversation is get downing to go chilling. As the scene progresses. the owner answers a inquiry with. “Proprietor: This [ gas station ] was my wife’s father’s topographic point.

This essay could be plagiarized. Get your custom essay
“Dirty Pretty Things” Acts of Desperation: The State of Being Desperate
128 writers

ready to help you now

Get original paper

Without paying upfront

Chigurh: You married into it” ( McCarthy 54 ) . Chigurh is offended from the deficiency of control the proprietor has over his ain life by the proprietor get marrieding into a money orientated point. the gas station. While Chigurh is aggressive of deriving what he wants from life. the proprietor sits back and takes advantage of other people’s difficult work. As Chigurh grows weary. he takes a coin from his pocket and flips it and allows fate to make up one’s mind his life. The owner calls the coin right and unwittingly wins every possible facet in his life in that individual minute. Yet. Chigurh believes he is non the decider of life or decease. but alternatively an instrument of destiny. The destiny people brought upon themselves for the deficiency of power. a destiny that leads the gas station proprietor to an inevitable conference with Chigurh. This scene spurs the argument between free will and predestination. Chigurh’s coin tossing settees what the victim will come across following. whether it is life or decease. It can now be assumed there are factors. in which it can non be avoided because it is predetermined.

On the other manus. his brush with Carla Jean Moss contradicts predestination. Carla Jean Moss swears. “You dont have to make this” and. hence. does non name the coin ( McCarthy 257 ) . This does non discourage Chigurh and he shoots her. demoing in some instances. person still has a pick on how a trade good will complete. Moral relativism. the philosophized impressions that right and incorrect are non absolute values. but alternatively personalized harmonizing to the person and his or her fortunes or cultural orientation. trades Bell as an eyewitness of crime’s development. The fresh inquiries if the adult male who murders without compunction. but does so with a moral codification. or drug traders. whose lone involvement is drugs and money. or the larceny. who thieves the money. more evil.

When people feel the demand to utilize moral judgement to reply such inquiries. they face many conflicting quandary. As stated in Steven Lukes’ Moral Relativism. “One is the idea that there are actions and manners of behaviour that are right and others that are incorrect universally…” ( Lukes ) . Yet. those right or incorrect values can differ from individual to individual. Chigurh even creates a doctrine for himself. every bit evil as it seems. which transcends money and drugs into some kind of credo. As good. Bell often recalls past experiences. which makes him believe offense has been distorted over the old ages. One observation was a study on the complications a figure of schools faced around the state in the 1930s:

And the biggest jobs they could call was things like talkin in category and runnin in the hallways. Chewin gum. Copyin prep. Thingss of that nature. So they got one of them signifiers that was clean and printed up a clump of mutton quad and sent em back out to the same schools. Forty old ages subsequently. Well. here come the replies back. Rape. incendiarism. slaying. Drugs. Suicide. ( McCarthy 196 )

The distinct reply shocked Bell and made him accept that the universe will fall to destroy Oklahoman or subsequently. Theories besides conspire sing the ground felons commit offenses. Some mistake genetic sciences. such as Cesare Lombroso. “…who in 1876 promoted the theory of ‘anthropological determinism’ that basically stated that criminalism was inherited and that person ‘born criminal’ could be identified by physical defects…” ( Bryant ) . Nevertheless. the scrutiny of the most ill-famed names in history. such as. Adolf Hitler or. more-recently. James Holmes. both demonstrated promising hereafters. Until the decease of a loved one or the failure of run intoing a superb academic outlook they all of a sudden snapped into the heartless murderers the public presently perceives the two. The indurate and coldblooded Acts of the Apostless the two took upon their victims are distinguished as the most horrid workss an person can perpetrate to another. However. through the killers’ eyes. in order to purge the public. their proceedings were to deliver humanity from what they considered shocking. Therefore. their reading of moral codification is a great trade diverse than the conventional behaviour.

States every bit good have dissimilar sets of legislative assembly within their boundaries. Some Torahs are shared within all states. for case. slaying and larceny. although the significance may differ from state to state. As said by Alex Woolf. “…there are other types of activities. such as drug usage. gaming. and harlotry. that are offenses in some states but non in others” ( Woolf 5 ) . Ultimately. people vary by ethical motives.

McCarthy demonstrates another subject. in which. if given the opportunity. worlds are capable of making evil Acts of the Apostless and the freedom to make what they wish. The general thought is that the immoralities of human nature are much more prevailing in current society so foremost considered. With the words of Robert E. Howard. “Civilized work forces are more discourteous than barbarians because they know they can be impolite without holding their skulls split. as a general thing” ( Howard ) .

In add-on. Nihilism. or the rejection of all spiritual and moral rules. frequently in the belief that life is nonmeaningful. is reoccurring throughout the novel since it exists in Chigurh. The reader is presented with a character that has the will to kill anyone who inconveniences him. Chigurh. while the other. Moss. is willing to give a peaceable life in order to obtain material addition. Chirugh carries his function cleanly. he obliterates everyone who stands in his manner. gets the money and vanishes ; Moss non so much. Last. each character represents a different immorality in the universe. an evil that can effortlessly be identified and another that is being acceptable within a society. A state swarmed with offenses and with citizens interrupting fixed Torahs without vacillation. it creates a ruinous anticipation of what future societies will come to digest.

No affair what happens. the rhythms of force will ne’er discontinue to be – it can non be killed or put away by agencies of action. The fact that Chigurh lives and flawlessly escapes jurisprudence enforcement. represents the reverberations of offense and the good does non needfully win in the terminal. Bell comments how the universe has drastically evolved into a dark and awful topographic point that is unsafe and unprompted and he can non be a portion of it any longer. This epiphany is Bell’s ultimate ground for retirement. The universe is non what it used to be. hence one significance for the rubric No Country for Old Men. and Bell witnessed the statement first-handed.

Cite this page

No Country for Old Men Research Paper Sample. (2017, Aug 31). Retrieved from

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront