The narrative “The Happy Prince” has at least three subjects. The first subject of the narrative is that outward beauty is nil. It is merely a show. The existent beauties are love and forfeits. The 2nd subject is that love and forfeit are two salvaging forces. The 3rd subject is that there is great spread between the rich and the hapless. the swayers and the multitudes. When the happy prince is alive. he lives in a castle where sorrow is non allowed to come in. He lives a life of felicity. However. when he dies his courtiers set u his legislative act on a tall column. The statue of the happy prince sees all the wretchedness of the metropolis. He weeps when he sees people in problem. He wants to assist them. A swallow corsets at the pess of the statue of the happy prince for the dark.
On happy prince’s petition. he prolongs his stay and helps the hapless with the ruby and the sapphires. When the happy prince can non see any more. the swallow decides to remain with the happy prince everlastingly. The he helps the people with the gold covering of the happy prince. At the terminal. he dies hoar. The bosom of the happy prince besides breaks. Once. the city manager and the town councilors pass by the stature of the happy prince. They are shocked to see it without ruby. sapphires. and gold covering. It looks ugly without them. They pull it down and make up one’s mind to do another statue. The bosom of the happy prince non melt in the furnace and the workers throw it on the dust pile where the dead sup is already lying. An angel comes and takes both the bosom and the dead Swallow to God as two cherished things. ( 296 ) 1. “The Happy Prince” is a reasonably narrative. Discuss.
No uncertainty. the narrative “The Happy Prince” is a fairy narrative. In a reasonably narrative we find unreal characters like faeries. giants. enchantresss and speaking animate beings. It is a narrative. which is difficult to believe. The events of a fairy narrative do non go on in existent life. The most of import quality of a fairy narrative is that it ever has a happy decision. When we read the narrative. we find that it is a perfect fairy narrative. It fulfils all the demands of a fairy narrative. First. we find two fanciful characters – a speaking Swallow and a speaking statue. In our day-to-day life. we do non happen such characters. Second. we see the statue of the Happy Prince casting cryings on the agonies of the hapless. He has sapphire eyes and a lead bosom. However. he can see through these sapphire eyes and has love and understandings for the hapless in his lead bosom. This is extremely incredible and it does non go on in existent life. A statue has no eyes and no bosom. Third. we see that the Swallow foremost picks off ruby. sapphires. and so gold covering without any tools. This is besides incredible. Fourthly. the terminal of the narrative is besides fairy narrative like. No uncertainty. the Swallow and the statue of the Happy Prince are dead and on the dust pile. However. this is non the existent stoping.
The existent stoping is that the Swallow will ever sing in the garden of Paradise and the Happy Prince will ever praise God in the metropolis of gold. This is rather a happy stoping and fulfils the most of import demand of a fairy narrative. Therefore. we can reason that the narrative “The Happy Prince” is a perfect fairy narrative. ( 291 ) 2. How has the author brought out poorness in the narrative “The Happy Prince” ? The author has brought out poorness in a really beautiful mode. The boy of the seamster is enduring from febrility. He is thirsty and inquiring for oranges. However. she is a hapless seamster. She can non purchase oranges for her boy. She is embroidering passionflowers for the Queen’s maids-of-honour. Her poorness is really affecting. The poorness of the authors of the Victorian age has besides been reflected really attractively. The immature author is cold and hungry. Hunger has made him conk. The small dolorous lucifer miss besides depicts the poorness of the Victorian age. She has no places or stockings. and her small caput is au naturel. The mendicants are sitting at the Gatess of the houses of the rich people.
In dark lanes. there are kids who have white starvation faces. They are looking out listlessly at the black streets. Peoples do non hold their ain houses go two small male childs are lying under the archway of a span. It is cold so they are lying in one another’s arm to maintain themselves warm. They are really hungry. Therefore. all these suggest the poorness of the Victorian age. ( 187 ) 3. How has the author brought out development in the narrative “The Happy Prince” ? The author has brought out development really attractively. The people at tribunal. the Jews. and the rich are working the hapless. The Mayor and the Town Councilors represent the development of the power. The boy of the dressmaker is enduring from febrility. but she can non go to to him. She is embroidering passionflowers for the Queen’s made-of-honour to have on at the following court-ball. The hapless are working hard. but they can non purchase even oranges. This is the worst sort of development. On one side. some people are so hapless that they are hungering and on the other manus the rich are doing merry and the Jews are weighing out money on Cu graduated tables. The authors of that clip are besides being exploited. They are cold and cold with hungriness.
The Mayor and the Town Councilors are working their powers. Each one of them himself wants to hold built statue. The Mayor even issues a announcement that birds are non to be allowed to decease at that place. This is strictly an development of power. ( 171 ) 4. How has the author brought out lip service in the narrative “The Happy Prince” ? The author has brought out lip service in the narrative “The Happy Prince” in a really beautiful mode. One of the town councilors does non hold artistic gustatory sensation. but he wants to demo that he has that artistic gustatory sensation. He praises the beauty of the Happy Prince in the most unartistic manner. He says that the statue is every bit beautiful as a weathercock. His simile shows how nescient he is. He is so hypocrite that he adds that he is non rather utile for the fright of the people. Because in those yearss people believed that art must hold had some usefulness. otherwise it was bad art. The town councilors are the worst illustration of lip service. They ever agree with the Mayor merely to acquire his favor. They are so dissemblers that they even repeat the words spoken by the Mayor.
When the professor sees the Swallow. he writes a long missive to the local newspaper. It is full of so many words that people can non understand it. However. they still quote it to each other merely to demo off. Therefore. this is how the author shows the lip service of the people. ( 191 ) 5. What is the subject of the narrative “The Happy Prince” ? The narrative “The Happy Prince” has at least three subjects. The first subject of the narrative is that outward beauty is nil it is merely a show. The existent beauty is the love and forfeit. The terminal of the narrative gives this thought. The Happy Prince has a lead bosom. but this bosom is full of understandings for the hapless and the needy. He sacrifices his eyes and beauty merely to assist them. He gives off his gold covering spot by spot to the hapless. Now without his eyes and gold covering. he looks so ugly that he is sent to furnace to run. He has lost outward beauty. but with forfeit and love. he has achieved religious beauty. God is pleased with him. After his decease. he is taken to the metropolis of gold where he will praise God everlastingly.
The same happens with the Swallow. He sacrifices his life for the love of the Happy Prince. However. he besides achieves religious beauty. He will sing for evermore in God’s garden of Paradise. The 2nd subject is that love and forfeit are two salvaging forces. This universe is full of poorness. lip service. and development. If there were no love and forfeit. the universe could non travel on its axis. It is because of love and forfeit that this life is traveling on. Therefore. it is true that love and forfeit are two salvaging forces. The 3rd subject of the narrative is that there is great spread between the rich and the hapless. the swayers and the multitudes. The Happy Prince did non cognize about the hapless and their jobs when he was alive. Therefore. it means that the swayers at that clip did non cognize about the jobs and the troubles of the multitudes. ( 295 ) 6. Why does the Happy Prince weep?
The Happy Prince weeps because he can non bear the agonies and the wretchednesss of the hapless and the needy. He weeps because he has a really soft bosom. although it is made of lead. This bosom had nil but the understandings for the hapless and the needy. The author values this lead heard so much that he tells the reader that this bosom does non run in the furnace. The Happy Prince used to populate in the Palace of Sans-Souci. Sorrow was non allowed to come in the Palace. At that clip. the Happy Prince did non cognize what cryings were. In the daylight. he used to play with his comrades in the garden. In the eventide. he led the dance in the Great Hall. There was a really exalted wall around the garden. The Happy Prince did non cognize that what was beyond that wall. Inside this wall. everything was beautiful and he was really happy. His courtiers called him Happy Prince. After his decease. his courtiers made his statue and set it up on a really tall column. Now from that tallness he can see all the ugliness and all the wretchedness of the metropolis. Therefore. he weeps because he has really soft bosom and he can non stand the wretchednesss of the people. It is because of this soft bosom that he sacrifices his beauty and sapphire eyes. ( 229 )
7. What did the Swallow tell the Happy Prince about the metropolis and the people? What did the Swallow study to the Happy Prince about human wretchedness or agony? When the Happy Prince gave away his sapphire eyes. he could non see any more. Therefore. he asked the Swallow to wing over his metropolis and told him what he saw at that place. The Swallow flew over the great metropolis and reported to the Happy Prince what he saw. He told the Happy Prince about the status of the rich and the hapless. The rich were doing merry in their beautiful houses. while the mendicants were sitting at the Gatess. In the dark lanes. he saw the white faces of hungering kids.
These kids were so hungry that they were looking out listlessly at the black streets. He told the Happy Prince a really suffering thing. He told him about the two male childs who were hungry and stateless. These male childs were lying under the archway of a span. They were cold so they were lying in one another’s weaponries to maintain themselves warm. but the watcher did non allow those male childs lie under the span either. He drove them out into the rain. Therefore. the Swallow told the Happy Prince about the status of the rich and the hapless. The rich were hungry and homeless. When the Happy Prince listened to this. he asked the Swallow to give his gold covering to the hapless and the needy. ( 216 ) 8. Discourse the terminal of the narrative “The Happy Prince” .
The narrative “The Happy Prince” is a fairy narrative and the terminal of a reasonably narrative is ever happy. In a reasonably tale characters face troubles and they endanger their lives to acquire their coveted ends. They face so many adversities that it appears that they can non win. However. at the terminal they ever win and populate merrily of all time after. In the narrative. “The Happy Prince” the terminal appears tragic. The Swallow and the Happy Prince both dice and are thrown on a dust pile. However. this is non the existent terminal of the narrative. The Swallow and the Happy Prince has sacrificed their lives to assist the hapless and the needy. God is happy with their forfeits. Therefore. God rewards them and orders that the Swallow will sing in the garden of Eden and the Happy Prince will praise him. Therefore. we see that this is rather a happy stoping. It fulfills the most of import demand of a fairy narrative. This terminal can non be called a tragic terminal. ( 169 )
1. Motivating minuteThe metropolis stood the statue of the Happy Prince. which is really beautiful. decorated with all right gold. ruby and sapphires. The citizens love it. nevertheless. some of them think it is non utile.
At the beginning of this narrative. the writer straight described the Happy Prince’s visual aspect and so used the citizens’ words to stress the “happy” image of the Happy Prince. However. after reading the whole narrative. we can detect that the name of the Happy Prince is dry. since he wasn’t happy at all.
2. ExpositionThe Swallow autumn in love with Reed. so he didn’t travel to Egypt with the other sups. After other sups had gone. he felt lonely and tired of his lover. the Reed. The swallow think the Reed is a flirtatious miss. so he decided to go forth her.
This portion led to the ground why the Swallow departed and met the Happy Prince. We besides think that the love for the Reed is non the passion of the Swallow’s life.
3. ComplicationThe Swallow arrived at the metropolis and alighted between the pess of the Happy Prince. A bead fell on the Swallow. and he found out that the bead was the Prince’s tear. The Happy Prince demanded the Swallow to be his courier. assisting him to convey the gems to person in demand ; nevertheless. the Swallow agreed reluctantly.
In this episode. the Swallow grudgingly promised to assist the Happy Prince contrasts with the behaviour that he volitionally stayed with the Happy Prince and even give his life.
4. CulminateThe Happy Prince became blind. so the Swallow decided to remain with him and replaced his empty eyes. to watch the metropolis and state the Happy Prince what he sees. The Happy Prince so requested the Swallow to take off the all right gold covered on him and sent the gold to the hapless.
Although the Happy Prince lost his eyes. he still gave away his last cherished decoration-the gold. This shows the meaningful spirit of selflessness. It was when the Swallow looked around the metropolis detecting the wretchedness and was moved by the sort Happy Prince that made him remain.
5. ReversalThe Swallow shortly realized he would decease because of the cold winter. He determined non to go forth the Prince. because he loved him so much.
This is another illustration for selflessness.
6. CalamityThe Prince asked the Swallow to snog his lips. and the Swallow did so so fell down at the Prince’s pess. At that minute. a cleft sounded inside the statue as the Prince’s bosom broke. The statue was so pulled down and set into a furnace as it was no longer deemed “beautiful” .
The dramatic bosom cleft happens at the clip that the Swallow died. we think that it represent that the Happy Prince is wholly brokenhearted and besides felt despairing with the metropolis.
7. Moment of last suspense:Finally. the God asked his angels to happen “the two most cherished things in the metropolis. ” The Happy Prince’s broken bosom would non run and was brought up to heaven along with the dead sup.
At the concluding portion of this tragic narrative. the writer used the God to convey that though the universe is suffering. there is ever something warm and nice go oning around to light our universe. merely like the Happy Prince and the Swallow.
Our sentiment:The Swallow came across the Happy Prince after he ended the relationship with the Reed. At first. the Swallow tried to acquire out of the Happy Prince by assuring to administer his ruby to the hapless adult female and remain with him for adark. However. the Swallow became much unsure about his trip to Egypt after he finish many petitions from the Happy Prince. He started to see the wretchedness of the metropolis and that had made him to remain with the Happy Prince. Although. in the terminal. the Swallow and the Happy Prince were abandoned by the people in the metropolis. they still accomplished their dream to assist the hapless. We thought that it is irony because the citizen foremost regarded the Happy Prince as the positive representation of the metropolis. but after the Happy Prince became moth-eaten. they instantly scraped him. We believed that the author tried to convey the cherished principle” we can give ourselves to make good things for others” merely like the Happy Prince and the Swallow.