Fahrenheit 451 thesis statement

Read Summary
Summary

The 1967 film adaptation of Fahrenheit 451 by Vineyard Films explores themes of dyspepsia, society, censorship, and freedom of the individual. While the film shares the same themes as the book, there are many differences to note. The director, Frances Truffle, purposely cast Julie Christie to play both India and Claries to show that women are animalistic and cannot continue in their current society. Montage, the protagonist, searches for the internal wisdom and soul of the two women, and Claries becomes his teacher in the film, replacing the character of Faber from the book. The film also differs from the book in that women play a role in the reconstruction of the new society, reflecting the times in which it was made. Both the book and the film address the issues of a society that has allowed its government to take total control, where people have forgotten their histories and become victims of propaganda and censorship. Through Montage’s struggle and rebirth, both the reader and viewer are given the opportunity to see that the human spirit triumphs and that the knowledge books impart will never be destroyed.

Table of Content

All these themes, dyspepsia society, censorship, and freedom of the individual, are addressed in the 1967 Vineyard Films’ (Universal) version of Fahrenheit 451. Although the film reiterates the themes and basis of the book, there are many differences to contrast. In examining the film and novel, one important item to note is that the same actress, Julie Christie, plays both India (Milliard’s name in the film) and Claries.

When looking at this casting decision, one can deduce that the film director, Frances Truffle, purposefully made this decision to show the audience that the women are animal in the way that they cannot continue as they are in the present society. Although the two women are dramatically different in their beliefs, Montage continually searches for signs Of Clavicle’s energy and enthusiasm in his wife. Montage, is not focusing upon their physical appearance; he’s instead trying to find the internal wisdom and soul of the two women that he sees. Unfortunately, Claries dies in the book when Montage begins to understand her. However, in the film, Claries survives and, in fact, becomes his teacher she, in a way, replaces the character of Faber from the book who doesn’t appear in the film). She is the character who guides Montage to the book people hiding in the woods outside the city. Contemplate the fact that in the book, no women are present at the end of the novel, but in the film, women play a role in the reconstruction of the new society. Possibly, this difference reflects that the book was written in 1953, whereas the film was made 14 years later.

Regardless of the differences between the film and the book upon which the film is based, both stories of Fahrenheit 451 tackle the issues of a society that has allowed its government to take total control. Chillingly, people in this society have forgotten their histories and have allowed themselves to become victims of propaganda and censorship. In following the protagonist, Guy Montage, through his struggle and rebirth, the reader (and viewer) are given the opportunity to see that the human spirit triumphs and that the important knowledge that books can impart will never be destroyed.

Cite this page

Fahrenheit 451 thesis statement. (2018, Feb 10). Retrieved from

https://graduateway.com/essay-example-fahrenheit-26/

Remember! This essay was written by a student

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers

Order custom paper Without paying upfront